User talk:Escp99

License tagging for Image:Keyes nader.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Keyes nader.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Keyes nader.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Keyes nader.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Khatru2 07:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Keyes msnbc.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Keyes msnbc.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Khatru2 07:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, I'm AbigailAbernathy. This might not have been intentional, but I noticed that you recently removed some content from Larry Klayman without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, A Wild Abigail Appears!   Capture me.   Moves.  00:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 22:52, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanya Berenson


A tag has been placed on Tanya Berenson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:45, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Larry Klayman
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Demetrick Pennie
In the April 26, 2017 edit for the article about Demetrick Pennie (which you created), you wrote, "I represent Sgt. Pennie and he asked me to create this page." For WP:COI purposes, it would be helpful to know who you are, and in what capacity do you represent Pennie. Thanks. --Weazie (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

When I said "represent," I think a better way to put it is "doing in behalf of," as an advocate. It wasn't meant in some legal sense or that I represent him in any capacity at all. He's an associate of mine. (I was simply alerting people to the fact I have some dealings with him, for purposes of disclosure.) I seriously doubt there are any COI issues, since he didn't tell me specifically what to say and the article itself is sufficiently objective and properly sourced, I believe. Escp99 (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification. WP:COI, especially WP:COISELF ("You should not create or edit articles about yourself, your family, friends, or foes.), may be helpful in this regard.  --Weazie (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Demetrick Pennie for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Demetrick Pennie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Demetrick Pennie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Weazie (talk) 19:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Larry Klayman
Are you in any way associated with Klayman? Initially you edited only one article, then you switched and now edit only in relation to Klayman. That is strongly suggestive of a conflict of interest, which you should declare, if it exists. Guy (Help!) 18:29, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Demetrick Pennie
I have sent Draft:Demetrick Pennie back to draft space. It is substantially the same as the article deleted at AfD, so it would be a candidate for speedy deletion under criterion G4. —C.Fred (talk) 21:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Demetrick Pennie moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Demetrick Pennie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Demetrick Pennie


A tag has been placed on Demetrick Pennie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BostonMensa (talk) 21:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Demetrick Pennie
Hello, Escp99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Demetrick Pennie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Demetrick Pennie


Hello, Escp99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Demetrick Pennie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)