User talk:Eskeetit 21

April 2019
Hello, I'm AntiCedros. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fat acceptance movement have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. AntiCedros (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fat acceptance movement. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Chris (talk) 03:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Fat acceptance movement
Hi I'm Eskeetit 21 and I am just here to say that Cathy Young did not critisize the movement, in fact she stated facts rather than her own personal opinion. Fat acceptance/body acceptance was mainly about being comfortable with your body and making the necessary changes to be healthy but now it has changed due to people in society such as feminists and sjws. It is unhealthy telling someone that being 400 pounds is healthy and good isn't acceptable Eskeetit 21 (talk) 00:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Fat acceptance movement, you may be blocked from editing. Mz7 (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Just to be clearer in my message: it's okay to write that so-and-so said something, but the line is crossed when we write in Wikipedia's voice that someone was correct in their opinion about something. That is a violation of the neutral point of view policy, and it should be avoided in an encyclopedia. Hope this helps. Mz7 (talk) 23:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)