User talk:Esnertofidel

Welcome!
Hello, Esnertofidel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Undue weight issues in the Marie Antoinette article
Hello welcome to Wikipedia, it seems you don 't understand Wikipedia rules, an article should be neutral, describe events with sources, you are using a radical language(neocon,reactionary.. ) not fitting Wikipedia, you are talking about revert and you are the only person reverting engaging in edit warring, this may lead you to being blocked, I 'm still trying to be nice with you, I modified the content from some to a minority as a compromise which is the spirit of Wikipedia. The article showed what you called Marie Antoinette reactionary or lets say conservative policy, I know it, I contributed perhaps more than any person to this article nevertheless a very small place should be given to the other opinion, this is ok in Wikipedia as long as it is clear that it is the position of the minority not hijacking the position of the majority which is critical of Marie Antoinette in the article.Aubmn (talk) 13:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Please refrain from threatening editors, and keep the debate civil. Secondly, when your edits are deemed contentious by other editors, proceed by seeking consensus on the article talk page rather than engaging in edit warring. Last but not least, I invite you to carefully examine the contents of WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE, both of which state explicitly that minority views within the scholarly community are not be treated equally to mainstream views. Your edits are in violation of both these policies, and will therefore continue to be removed.


 * If your behavior continues to be based on confrontational and disruptive editing rather than in consensus building and compliance with Wikipedia policy, I will call upon moderators to resolve this situation. Thank you. Esnertofidel (talk) 13:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

First, I 'm the one seeking compromise, I changed the content and yet you reverted it again, if you revert one more time, you'll be breaking the 3 rule and you'll be blocked. Second the minority point of view is not treated equally far from it, let 's take the introduction, it is greatly critical of MA almost totally adopting the majority view, certainly over 90%, Finally you are using neocon, reactionary, that's a fact in your edits, I respect your opinion and the change I made reflect that.Thank you.Aubmn (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

That your last warning, one more revert, you'll be blocked, change my edit if you want, propose a compromise, I'm ready to listen...Aubmn (talk) 13:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You are engaged in edit warring with other editors, and judging by the talk page of the Marie Antoinette article, which reveals you have been repeatedly blocked in recent months, these are not isolated incidents. Consensus is reached by discussing the subject on the talk page, which you have categorically refused to do. Your behavior is in violation of several behavioral Wiki policies, specifically WP:OWN, WP:NPA and WP:Edit warring, and your edits likewise repeatedly violate what is stipulated by WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE.


 * The prose of the sentence you attempt to insert requires a rewrite to reflect its status as a minority view among historians, and must be moved out of the introduction to a more appropriate section of the article. WP:UNDUE makes it clear that minority views within an academic field are to receive little, if any, coverage relative to mainstream views. As such, its presence within the introduction causes it to assume undue weight. Wikipedia policies are not negotiable. Esnertofidel (talk) 13:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok you revert 3 times without waiting my response, I'm giving you 2 minutes to revert yourself or I'm going immediately to report you and you'll be immediately blocked.2 minutesAubmn (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

In my response, I was telling ok to rewrite it and why not moving it, the only problem where in the core of the article, began by reverting yourself.Aubmn (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Revert yourself please don 't oblige me to report you, you ''ll be immediately blocked.Aubmn (talk) 14:19, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok I'm reporting you, I'm trying to be nice and I proposed to rewrite it and to try to find a place to move it but you don 't even responded...you brought this on yourself.Aubmn (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)


 * In response to your relentless and vociferous violations of basic Wikipedia policies, I've opened up a discussion on the Marie Antoinette article's talk page, to notify the moderators who have previously blocked you that your disruptive behavior appears to be resurgent. Esnertofidel (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Ok good luck with that, I was only blocked once for multiple accounts which was not proven, all the editors are demanding from me to fill the sources in that article, I removed thousands of copyrights violations, completed the article and today putting sources and you know some of these people said I was to hard on MA showing her as a reactionary person... anyway this is a debate but you broke Wikipedia 3 revert rules and you'll be immediately blocked. Know since you responded, I 'm giving you a last chance what is the sentence and prose that should be changed in that opinion, I'll find a place to put it, you can open a debate but I can block you, that the difference, you broke the law, I didn't; know what is the change that you propose... Aubmn (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rollo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles III. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)