User talk:Esomeonee7

Your submission at Articles for creation: British-Saudi War 1790-1930 (June 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Apmh was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:British-Saudi War 1790-1930 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:British-Saudi_War_1790-1930 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Apmh&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:British-Saudi_War_1790-1930 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Ap m  h  14:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Battle of diriyah moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Battle of diriyah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mvqr (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anti Egyptanism


The article Anti Egyptanism has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Unless this can be expanded into an actual article, this belongs at Wiktionary instead."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Egyptian invasion of Najd


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Egyptian invasion of Najd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 62.253.28.221 (talk) 06:42, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, I'm Lone-078. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Modern history of Saudi Arabia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Lone-078 (talk) 18:04, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Battle of Khafji shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (Hohum @ ) 00:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sajid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abbasid Caliphate. R Prazeres (talk) 06:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 07:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 07:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Lourdes 04:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:British-Saudi War 1790-1930
Hello, Esomeonee7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British-Saudi War 1790-1930, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:British-Saudi War 1790-1930


Hello, Esomeonee7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "British-Saudi War 1790-1930".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of diriyah
Hello, Esomeonee7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of diriyah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)