User talk:Espenrh


 * Yo. Espen. Calling it the "Nobel Prize For Economics" is wrong.  From Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary:
 * Main Entry: er·ro·ne·ous\\
 * Pronunciation: i-'rO-nE-&s, e-'rO-\\
 * Function: adjective\\
 * Etymology: Middle English, from Latin erroneus, from erron-, erro wanderer, from errare\\
 * 1 : containing or characterized by error : MISTAKEN \\
 * 2 archaic : WANDERING\\
 * - er·ro·ne·ous·ly adverb\\
 * - er·ro·ne·ous·ness noun\\
 * Perhaps there is an agenda in not pointing out this error, but it is important.
 * Perhaps there is an agenda in not pointing out this error, but it is important.
 * Perhaps there is an agenda in not pointing out this error, but it is important.
 * Perhaps there is an agenda in not pointing out this error, but it is important.

Why are you quoting this dictionary entry? This posting doesn't make any sense at all.

The point is that even though it migh be more precise to refer to the prize by its full and formal name it's not erroneous to simply refer to it as the Nobel prize in economics.

If you'd like to continue this discussion the least thing you could do is to register as user.

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Espenrh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) John Sutton (economist) -
 * 2) Péter Molnár -
 * 3) Gennady Grushevoy -

Proposed deletion of Paulos Tesfagiorgis


The article Paulos Tesfagiorgis has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1   21:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)