User talk:Esperanto97/Archive 1

Stop Reverting articles without discussing on the talk page
I suppose you are User:Visioncurve as your account is very recent and you are acting in the same manner as he was. You just made an account after he has been blocked.Kami2018 (talk) 06:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * My account is 6 years old and this is a public library, everyone is entitled to use them any time and for free. I am not a sock puppet and I don't care about your assumption on whoever that person is or my identity or whatsoever. I made simple request to you to stop deleting portions of referenced information from articles. It has nothing to do with other users or your assumptions. You have been reverting referenced information and falsely claiming that those provided sources did not mention them, for instance:

*Moreover you have been warned by other users as well - So, would you please stop reverting referenced information and write in your edit summary that source does not mention this or that information, misinforming and misguiding other faithful editors. Please. --Esperanto97 (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1 - Source clearly mentions his origin as in the article, but you opted to delete it.
 * 2 - Multiple sources provided in support of that information contradicting your assumptions, but you haven't even clicked on them to check
 * 3 - It was a well-sourced information, Karamyan Sevak's article about Armenia from Yearbook of Muslims in Europe, vol.4, whose page 23 clearly states what you wanted to remove from the article claiming that source did not mention this info;
 * 4 - You have deleted referenced information and asked user:Visioncurve to provide you proofs, he did in his talk page with dozens of verifiable sources but you still kept deleting them,
 * 5 - You deleted what you claimed was an unreferenced info and but added your own unsourced and dubious material.
 * [6 by user:Yamaguchi, who wrote - Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kheshgi, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 7 - by user:Kansas Bear - Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Yusuf Adil Shah. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.
 * 8 0 by user Objective001 - Unexplained & unnecessary edit by kami2018. Kindly refrain from making pointless edits based your own personal political ideologies/beliefs. Undid revision 903645553 by Kami2018 (talk)) and so on.


 * Please file a report at WP:SPI. Esperanto97, if you are indeed, you'll want to declare it immediately. As a blocked user, this would be a clear violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Declaring this immediately would count in your favour, though of course your account will be blocked. Failing to declare this would be one strike against you toward a ban under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I am not a sock puppet. This is my only account and I won't declare anything that is not true. I admit this is not my PC, it belongs to a public library that is free for everyone to use. Kami2018 assumed my identity by looking at my contributions alongside that person's as an evidence, though I don't see any resemblance (you can check it yourself). I found Kami2018 and his disruptive edits through recent edits page and checked his contributions where the only thing he did was deleting portions of referenced materials from articles (I hope you will kindly take actions regarding that). If there's any way to prove my identity (that I'm not a sock puppet or whoever), I'm always ready --Esperanto97 (talk) 12:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)