User talk:Esquire22

I have restored many of the edits from the previous editor. These are legitimate biographical and professional statements, verified externally. Many, if not most, Wikipedia biographical posts include posts and titles held, books published, and summaries of major publications. I see nothing wrong with this matter. It may be "resume" like, but this is no reason to delete it from the site; if it were, we would not have many biographical posts, now would we? I suspect the previous editor may not agree with Ms. Foley's political views and may have deleted the information for this reason. That is inappropriate. Because this information is factual and verifiable, it should be retained. Esquire22 (talk) 05:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)ESQ22