User talk:Esquivalience/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, HelloThereMinions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Great to see you reverting vandalism. You may like to take a look at our page on cleaning up vandalism Noyster  (talk),  14:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Patrolling
Hi. Some of your AIV reports may not be sufficiently accurate although you have been accorded special rights by some admins. Also, once you have made a report, even if you  are badgered by  the reported user it's probably best  to ignore it  and let  the admins do  the rest. Keep AIV on  your wl  and see what  kind  of success rate you  are achieving  and if you  need any  help  don't  hesitate to  ask. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

NotTechimo
Hello, regarding this user NotTechimo, he was warned for edit warring as IP 71.235.154.73 ([|71.235.154.73 revision regarding edit war warning], but then he registered today the new account NotTechimo. Thank you. Techimo (talk) 05:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The person waring with me (Techimo) is the former owner of the business. He simply will not allow anything that isn't glowing PR about the company into the article. I've tried to discuss this with him and he ignores the factual content and instead tries to spin that my edits represent a COI. If the former owner of a business removing factual edits by others isn't a COI, then I don't understand the term "conflict of interest." NotTechimo (talk) 15:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Safety of electronic cigarettes. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Missing step in NAC
I don't mind the non-admin closure of Articles for deletion/Philip Nelson (professor) but when you do that can you make sure to remove the AfD template from the nominated page and copy the Old AfD template from it into the talk page? That didn't happen in this case, I'm guessing because of the page moves that happened after the nomination. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:30, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Money Free Party
Hi there, I was editing the above entry and you revert all the changes. Can you please let me know why? There a few mistakes in there that I was trying to fix. Thank you Andrei — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrei MFP (talk • contribs) 14:19, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about this, firstly, I suggest that you write it in the third person. Also, since Wikipedia is not a soapbox, you should report objectively about the beliefs of the Money Free Party from a neutral point of view. However, you appear to be closely connected to the subject (edit summary). Therefore, you should familiarize yourself with the core content policies, as it is easier for edits to articles that you're closely connected with to include bias and lack verifiability. However, you still can and are encouraged to edit the Money Free Party article as you may be able to expand the article more easily then non-connected editors, as soon as the newly added content is supported by reliable sources and you keep the content policies in mind. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia (your recent edit is definitely not inferior, it just needs to be more neutral)! Esquivalience t 01:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of topics characterized as pseudoscience. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syngenta
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syngenta. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of economic thought
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of economic thought. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Christian Terrorism
I'd like you to please reconsider your non-admin closure of this article's AfD. The closing commentary ventured that many of the delete votes were concerned with original research, which you argued could be solved with normal editing. I would argue that the core of our opposition to that article are that it is a gross, indeed archetypical, example of WP:SYNTH and (IMO) WP:BOLLOCKS descendant from a lack of credible neutral resources. Unlike original research, these are not surmountable with normal editing because they are ingrained in the premise of the article title itself. Basically, it's a scurrilous smear article that has no place on a reputable encyclopedia. Pax 05:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Revert of your WP:NAC closures of Christian Terrorism
Your are not an Admin as per policy non admins .extra care should be taken if a closure may be controversial or not clearly unambiguous. With the understanding that the closure may be reversed, non-admins should generally avoid closing such discussions.The nominated item is a controversial topic. This may be indicated by the broad topic area, related discussions, and previous XfDThat the item meets appropriate closure is a close call, for example, does "10-2" in favor of keep count as "nearly unanimous"? This article has been gone to Mediation and your NAC closure is totally wrong.This is very close debate want an admin to close it hence reverted you.
 * Hello. WP:NACD is the actual guideline on non-admin closures. It says:


 * Although the AfD is moderately controversial, I refrained from closing it until I saw the weakness of the arguments for deletion. Most of them are based on the article having original research and original synthesis, and that is not a valid deletion criterion because the problems can be fixed through normal editing (see WP:BEFORE, section c1). Because of the weakness of the arguments from the delete "side", there was consensus as the keep side (although there were some that offered weak rationales) offered valid arguments (mainly that the subject is notable). In this case, I would ignore all rules because of the consensus to keep due to the arguments from the delete side (mostly) being based on an invalid rationale. You must understand that consensus is not a head count. See WP:CONSENSUS for more information. Esquivalience t 11:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * You decide arguments on one side are "weak" (in your opinion), ignore the fact that most of the keep votes offer very weak rationales, and therefore take it upon yourself to close the AfD? And you don't revert it when you're asked, twice? Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Here's a breakdown of all the votes, and their weaknesses and strengths:


 * Delete. This article is a NPOV mess involving synthesis and fringe views presented on a par with mainstream views, in contravention of WP:UNDUE and giving false balance.  As an example, conflicts such as The Troubles were ethno-nationalist in nature, and are described as such by the vast majority of expert commentators. The existence of remarks by a tiny minority of commentators claiming it was partly religious in nature are used to justify the inclusion of a whole section on The Troubles in the article.  "As Per MOS if a group calls itself Christian it will be called Christian on Wikipedia." - quite possibly.  But none of the various IRAs, the INLA, or the vast majority of Loyalist terrorists identified themselves as "Christian".  The Orange groups that apparently did call themselves Christian had so minor a role they barely featured.  By the same token, Anders Breivik described himself as "not very religious", but gets included?  Likewise, much of the Indian events and actors seem - on the evidence presented in the article - to be unsourced, only peripherally touching on Christianity, or terrorism for that matter. Ultimately, the article seems to be a collection of disjointed events that might, in some cases, involve some people who might be Christians, and/or might be terrorists, with not that many reliable sources to back up the assertions. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC) - real concerns about the article, but they can be fixed through normal editing. Wikipedia is a indefinite work in progress.


 * Strong keep Obviously, the article is an WP:NPOV mess. However, that's not really a reason for deletion of the entire article. Of course it needs cleanup and sections should be removed and added, but I think that it is necessary to keep this article. There are articles on Buddhist terrorism, Hindu terrorism, Islamic terrorism, and Jewish terrorism. Deleting this article, in my opinion, would illustrate more bias. Perhaps it should be a Collaboration of the Week at some point? I think that would help this article, but deleting is not the best option. BenLinus  1214 talk 16:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC) - WP:OTHERSTUFF: weak rationale.


 * keep - the article is kind of a mess. but not a reason for deletion. someone needs to take a good look at it though and improve it. per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC) - Slightly weak rationale, cites the WP:GNG, but doesn't clearly say why it does.


 * Keep and clean up. Artw (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC) - no rationale


 * Delete, and nail the lid shut. This article exists for exactly one reason: to serve as a WP:COATRACK. Do other religions have similar articles? WP:OTHERSTUFF. (And I shouldn't have to belabor the obvious, that Jesus was a pacifist, whereas the founders of some other religions were decidedly not, and hence any alleged "Christians" committing terrorism are bullshitting.) Pax 03:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC) - again, problems can be fixed through normal editing.


 * Keep I'm really not going to get into a debate over whether a possibly not-real figure was a possibly pacifist, since Jesus is nothing to do with whether or not we keep this article. It is a bit of a mess, but this term and concept does exist. See things such as from ThinkProgress, this by Juan Cole, and this in Time Magazine and this in The EastAfrican.  JT dale Talk ~ 07:09, 20 March 2015 (UTC) - rationale is based on the notability guideline and cites some sources to prove it. One out of the four cited sources is probably self-published, though, leaving three: the rest covers the subject.


 * Reply wrong argument Article was created in 2004 that is 11 years ago and requests for more time  is wrong argument as per WP:MERCY and other endless discussions and mediation for 6 months have come to nothing and only reinforce that is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH.Valetta66 (talk) 13:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC) - rationale edit


 * Keep. No true Scotsman arguments about whether terrorists are actually Christian are irrelevant.  The topic obviously has coverage in reliable sources; for example,  from Slate.com, and  from Salon.com.  If the article is problematic, then it can be cleaned up through normal editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC) - Offers a rationale based on notability, however the reliability of the cited sources is challenged.


 * delete The Slate and Salon pieces are editorials and lack a neutral tone, and that's really the problem all around in this. Wikipedia's articles on religious terrorism (and the Christianity one is particularly bad on this) are heavily driven by a POV that views religion as a menace. It's particularly obvious in the lack of an atheist terrorism article, and my guess is that the other religious terrorism articles suffer to some degree or another from the same fault. There are endless arguments over specific cases and a determined ignorance of problems such as that in N. Ireland the religious parties were surrogates for the underlying political contest (our own articles on the matter say as much). Mangoe (talk) 17:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC) - Challenges the Slate and Salon sources, but they are not the only sources that cover Christian terrorism.


 * Strong Keep - As per WP:NOTCENSORED, nothing should be censored in Wikipedia, just because it offends a few groups. Also, there are hundred references, most of them are researched books, which means, this article is highly sourced and referenced with reliable sources. So, deleting this will be a mockery of what wikipedia stands for. - Vatsan34 (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC) - Offers an argument based on notability, citing the references that cover this topic in the article (not all cover the topic directly, but they are enough to prove notability).


 * Keep - Clean it up. Stub it if you must but there is enough material out there to support and sustain this topic in an NPOV way. Jbh (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC) - weak rationale, but at least states that problems can be fixed through normal editing.


 * Stubify pending outcome of mediation. --Scolaire (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC) - mediation


 * Delete WP:COATRACK, involving WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and some serious WP:CHERRYPICKING. To put this disgrace of an article together, editors roped together Guy Fawkes' failed participation in an international power struggle, the racism of the Ku Klux Klan, Lebanon's Maronite, Sunni, Shia power struggle, and even - Lord help us - Anders Behring Breivik.  If that isn't enough unrelated material hung on this WP:COATRACK, the article wades into the intricate complexities of hill tribes, the Hindu expansion, colonization, identity and power in eastern India.  Problem is that there is little beyond a couple of opinion columns and the fact that individuals and groups of of Christian background were involved in movements with little else connecting them.  Certainly no body of theoretical work on the relationship between Christianity and the choice terrorism as a tactic is cited.  Nor am I aware that such a literature exists.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC) - problems can be fixed with normal editing, except for the last three sentences which gives that there is no body of theoretical work on the relationship between Christianity and the choice terrorism as a tactic exists. But it's not proven.


 * Delete per nom. In some incidents the perpetrators seem to be fighting each other about the identities that they hold about themselves and not about the religion in particular. ༆ (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2015 (UTC) - delete per nom, based on nominator's statement, concurs with it.


 * Delete This article is certainly against WP's neutrality policies. It also fails to substantiate how it's cited terrorist instances are consistent with historical Christianity. No element of that religion compels it's followers by instruction from their holy book to carry out heinous crimes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathankyle2188 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)  - problems can be fixed through normal editing


 * Keep If an organization calls itself Christian, it is Christian per the MOS. list of Islamic terrorist attacks does not represent Islam in general, just as this article does not represent Christianity as a whole.  Konveyor   Belt   22:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC) - weak rationale


 * Strong Keep per arguments already raised here and in the earlier nomination, and because it's obviously an important, verifiably notable topic. Just because the !votes here don't like it and would rather not believe it's a real thing, it absolutely is and definitely deserves discussion in any unbiased encyclopedic source. -- samj in out 13:19, 25 March 2015 (UTC) - cites notability, but doesn't say why.


 * Keep The nominating statement is flawed as it is the editor's opinion that Christianity had nothing to do with the acts. Also, it seems WP:BEFORE wasn't done., , --Neil N  talk to me 13:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC) - cites sources on the notability. The opinion part can be ignored for the purposes of this.


 * Delete per Bastun and E.M.Gregory. As synthesis and and fringe views presented on a par with mainstream views and  WP:UNDUE and giving false balance. Further the very basic definition or what is implied or what is Christian Terrorism is not yet defined despite  over 3 months of mediation now suspended and this article has been there for ages almost a decade over 11 years.Further no Global view of Christian Terrorism is given the article a maze of local conflicts which are ethno-nationalist conflicts ,insurgencies  which are clearly not Religious and in no way can the violence be justified by religion or any tenat of religion.All these local have standalone articles which is fine but to club all of them together as Christian Terrorism is original research .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:50, 26 March 2015 (UTC) - problems can be fixed through normal editing.


 * Keep - The nominating statement is from a non-neutral POV. Though your opinion seems like an obvious truth to you, it may not be so obvious from another POV, and would need deeper explanation. As such, this topic should be addressed on Wikipedia. The content entirely depends on what consensus finds are reliable sources. I agree that it should be written from a more NPOV than it is presently. Mamyles (talk) 16:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC) - weak
 * Please address the issues raised by User:Pharaoh of the Wizards and others, so that we can move this conversation forward.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Although there are many weak or slightly weak rationales from both sides, some of the keep votes in particular cite notability and the fact that the problems can be fixed with normal editing as the reason to keep (which are valid rationales). However, with the amount of controversy as indicated by the bluntness and this argument, I refrain from this dispute. Esquivalience t 20:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: But there is no notability because, while there exists a smattering of POV magazine editorials miserably attempting to establish a smear meme, there are no suitable, unbiased sources. Quoting E.M.Gregory: "Certainly no body of theoretical work on the relationship between Christianity and the choice terrorism as a tactic is cited. Nor am I aware that such a literature exists." -- Given the incendiary "attack" nature of the article's title, we should require authoritative sources.<b style="font-family:georgia; font-size:11pt; color:#BFA3A3"> Pax</b> 22:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The difficulty that I perceive in the Keep votes is lies in the assertion that this article CAN be improved. The article on Islamic terrorism (which I have proposed moving to "Islamist terrorism" draws on a large body of scholarship by men and women of many faiths but notably inclusing avowed Islamists that describerd a discrete and coherent ideology that originates in a definable period of a few years and unites a large number of terrorist groups operating worldwide.  Christian terrorism is a term applied in this article to terrorists who happen to be Christian, or who claim Christian justification as one among a list of motivations, although they are drawn from widely separated eras and the Christianities to which they adhere vary widely.  There is no commonality to these ideologies, even excluding the ones who disavow religious motivation altogether.   It is this very mix and disparity of type and motivation that appears to have prevented scholars from dealing with "Christian terrorism" as a coherent topic.  It is one thing to assert that such an article can be improved, quite another to discover sources of any weight.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Advanced capitalism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Advanced capitalism. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Capital accumulation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Capital accumulation. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marnie the Dog
Hello! Your submission of Marnie the Dog at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Relentlessly (talk) 08:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Capitalist mode of production
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Capitalist mode of production. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
No thanks for your contributions&#32;to User talk:Tony Tan 98. We are trying to celebrate April Fools' Day. Remember that Wikipedia allows April Fools' jokes outside the article namespace, and prohibits attempts to sabotage the holiday, so you shouldn't take what we do there seriously. If you'd like to experiment with warning users, use the sandbox instead. If you continue to hinder the attempts at humor by other editors, you may be blocked without further warning. Have some fun, <b style="color:#28589C">Tony Tan</b><sup  style="color:#4775FF">98  ·  talk  21:20, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Marnie (dog) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marnie (dog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marnie (dog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EEng (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Check It
Rebuttal to nomination for speedy delete added to Check It. --Ryanaxp (talk) 23:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Susan Harbage Page
Thanks for pointing out the lack of references. They were there, but just not linked properly.Hhgendron (talk) 00:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foie gras
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foie gras. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Production, costs, and pricing
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Production, costs, and pricing. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Non-admin AfD closures
Hi, I've noticed you've done a number of non-admin AfD closures, which is very much appreciated. However, you should only non-admin close something in clear and obvious cases. In both Articles for deletion/Newgen Software and Articles for deletion/Chattahooligans, there were editors who disagreed in good faith with the final result, so I don't think the standard non admin closure or speedy keep criteria could have been used. (For what it's worth, I've been told off about this as well here). <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  09:58, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for voicing your concern; however, I would define a clear case as one where there is little question about the consensus (i.e. where I don't have to spend more than (just a rough figure) a minute to roughly determine the consensus). On the first one, it wasn't as clear as an unanimous consensus, but the consensus was towards keep and there was one delete vote that I discounted (not yours) because it was completely unrelated (called the article a biography and also placed similar rationales on different articles, I did not discount your vote, though). On the second one, although there were delete votes, redirecting and merging is preferred over deletion, so I redirected/merged the article instead. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 22:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * There was also Articles for deletion/Allie X: originally three separate discussions which were bundled, requiring a more nuanced close than you gave it (as a commenter, I was WP:INVOLVED). IMO this discussion was more controversial than a simple vote count implied, with threads from the other two discussions less visible in the bundling. Northamerica1000's comment about the close was relevant, and this one should also have been left to an admin. All the best,  Mini  apolis  13:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, that one was more controversial, with, despite a reasonable consensus, it has a ANI complaint over one of its participants. Feel free to revert my closure. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 20:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The ANI thread, like many, was basically a content dispute. No, I couldn't revert your closure even if I wanted to; I'd just be a bit more careful if I were you, because NACs can be a minefield. All the best,  Mini  apolis  01:37, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:MyWikiBiz
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:MyWikiBiz. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Marnie (dog)
Allen3 talk 08:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brown rice
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brown rice. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ale Resnik
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ale Resnik. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beepi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beepi. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

The user Shajee Ahmad
Is also a possible sock puppet, see Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj. Wgolf (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Mandalasana
Hi. I've had to revert your non-admin closure of this AfD as there was not a unanimous consensus to redirect. An alternative could be to !vote redirect in the AfD instead. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  07:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Also, I'm surprised at your NAC of Articles for deletion/Annette Beck-Sickinger - certainly the majority of !votes were keep, but as a BLP in a controversial event, I think this would have been best handled by an admin. I don't believe it's policy for any non-admin to close any AfD per WP:SNOW, unless I've missed something? <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  10:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * For the first AfD, it would make a plausible redirect as per WP:POFRED § Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.). Even if it were deleted, it could just be redirected to List of asanas by creating it; for the purposes of WP:BURO, I just redirected it. If it was a merge, I would have voted to merge instead, however, since obvious plausible redirects can just be created after deletion, I just redirected it to the right target. The AfD also proves that Redirect deletion criterion 10 would not apply. For the second AfD, WP:NACD (the guideline, as opposed to the essay) probably refers to the discussion (decision) rather than the topic (correct me if I'm wrong.)


 * Also, WP:NACD says Participants, including participating administrators, should not reopen non-admin closures., however, I appreciate WP:BRDing. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 20:57, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Your rationale for a redirect is fine, but that should go in a !vote in the AfD if you have a strong enough opinion about a result. I would question whether "redirect" is a good choice without at least one reliable source to prove the term wasn't just made up. Certainly as things stood, there was no obvious consensus for a redirect. So I rolled back the AfD to give you a chance to !vote instead.
 * In general, my view is that non-admin closures should be avoided outside very obvious and unanimous cases. Indeed, the deletion policy suggests most closures should be handled by an admin. If you're concerned about the backlog of AfDs (and that's good), why not try a RfA? <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  07:42, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair objection; I guess I should be a bit more careful when closing sometimes-heated AfD debates. However, I would probably WP:SNOW an RfA. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 20:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nature's Harmony Farm
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nature's Harmony Farm. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your eyes, please
I as that you revisit Pesarattu (2015) to look at the work easily done and perhaps reconsider your opinion at Articles for deletion/Pesarattu (2015). Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

NAC
Hi. Thank you for helping out by closing AfD debates. I'd just thought it might be worthwhile mentioning that it generally befalls the closer to carry out the recommended action in so far as they have access to the tools to do it, otherwise such closures are just creating more work for someone else (like me) and are best left to those who know what to do with mergers and redirects for schools - for example. If you need any explanations for further use don't hesitate to ask me. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:12, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Xiaomi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Xiaomi. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Wine n' about ‎
I am interested in knowing why you think it's suspicious? I suspected Phil Copperman and Hash Tag 444 to be the same person, simply because of the timing of their 'votes'. Was that in your mind as well? --Cahk (talk) 19:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * : Pretty much; they were the first ones to vote, they had a basic knowledge of notability (which is also suspicious), and their votes were spaced two minutes from each other. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 19:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:G. Edward Griffin. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Shoppersexpress
I have few more reliable sources (references). Hoping to get accepted. Thanks :) Rohitsakala (talk) 04:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marnie (dog)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marnie (dog) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 21:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Freddie Gray. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of most-produced aircraft
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-produced aircraft. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marnie (dog)
The article Marnie (dog) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marnie (dog) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 06:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Conversion therapy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conversion therapy. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Multiway switching
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Multiway switching. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to comment on VP proposal: Establish WT:MoS as the official site for style Q&A on Wikipedia
You are being contacted because of your participation in the proposal to create a style noticeboard. An alternate solution, the full or partial endorsement of the style Q&A currently performed at WT:MoS, is now under discussion at the Village Pump. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Embraer E-Jet E2 family
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Embraer E-Jet E2 family. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Sectioned discussion
Sectioned discussion is in effect on the Lightbreather arbitration case's talk page. Any comments must be made in your own section. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) 16:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Acupuncture
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Acupuncture. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vivint
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vivint. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Marnie (dog)
I haven't seen any action on the review on hold. Before I close it out, I want to ask you to review it, take any action, or respond to it. If you need access to any of the sources I mentioned, I can put them on dropbox for you. Viriditas (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, this is my last attempt to contact you. I would rather not fail this nice article.  But in order for me to pass it as a good article, there are a few changes I want to see.  I can hold your hand and walk you through them (per the review) or I can fail it.  I'm not sure why you are ignoring me, but if it is because you don't have the time, simply say so. Viriditas (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 26 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 05:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ask.com
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ask.com. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Deletion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Workshop
Why this deletion? Please ping me when you reply. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 10:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Because it is not really related to the decision, more to the evidence. I could have just stricken or hatted it because there was a comment, but the comment is about this being presented in the evidence. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 22:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steve Jobs
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Jobs. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marnie (dog)
The article Marnie (dog) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Marnie (dog) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 03:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 27 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 05:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March Against Monsanto. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

== Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies ==

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Removal of talk page message
I have removed the talk page post you made at User talk:Danielleamy, telling the editor about a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Danielle amy Marshall. I know, of course, that removing another editor's comment is normally considered unacceptable, but I thought this was a rare occasion when it was reasonable to make an exception. The message served no useful purpose, since the deletion discussion it referred to was not taking place, and a new editor might well be confused by it. I can't imagine any reason why you should object to my removing it under the circumstances, but if you disagree then please let me know.

I suggest that the best thing to do to the aborted deletion discussion would be to delete it. If you agree, please let me know, and I will delete it under speedy deletion criterion G7 (Request for deletion by the author of the page.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Tesla
Thanks for closing the RfC at talk:Nikola Tesla and for moving some discussions to the subpage. Are you planning to remove the other discussions, such as talk:Nikola Tesla, talk:Nikola Tesla, talk:Nikola Tesla, and talk:Nikola Tesla? If not, I'm just going to archive them. Also, what do you think of placing an edit notice on the talk page, alerting editors that nationalistic discussion belong on the sub page?- MrX 01:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging or messaging all the editors in the discussions should be done. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 03:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 28 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 20:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Bots
You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-June/081931.html  This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including mediawiki.org) on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages ), it's time to fix your code!


 * The simple solution is to simply include the "rawcontinue" parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&rawcontinue=1>). No other code changes should be necessary.
 * Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example <https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=allpages&continue=>), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly.

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Esquivalience is your first account?
User:Esquivalience is the first account you have ever had on Wikipedia? Flyer22 (talk) 02:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

If you reply to me on this, I'd rather that you reply here instead of at my talk page; I prefer combined discussion and dislike disjointed discussion. Flyer22 (talk) 02:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have one other account that I cannot disclose except to the Functionaries team (which I already have dated May 23, 2015, 17:16 UTC), not because of the clean start process (only scrutiny was a ), but because of WP:SOCK § Privacy, and that because of name change; it could have implications if revealed.


 * I have one question: is this a sockpuppetry allegation? If it is, provide actual evidence. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 02:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Esquivalience, it's not a WP:Sockpuppetry allegation. It's just that, even though your User:Esquivalience account is relatively new and started out using WP:The Wikipedia Adventure, I highly doubted you were new to editing Wikipedia; I still doubt that. And sometimes I will outright ask an editor about any previous accounts they had (usually when I suspect WP:Sockpuppetry or a legitimate WP:Clean start). Thanks for replying. Flyer22 (talk) 03:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Are there any more suspicions? <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 03:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Economy of Argentina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economy of Argentina. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 29 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 00:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bob Muglia/GA1
Esquivalience, you opened this review on May 5, and haven't posted to it since May 12, with the bulk still not done. Do you plan on returning soon, or should we put it back into the reviewing pool? Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

One Minor Comment About the RFC
I agree with your closure of the RFC. My only minor comment is that you didn't use the term snow closure. An RFC normally runs for 30 days unless it is a snowball situation or it doesn't stand a snowball's chance in Hell. (Anyway, snow will last a long time in the Ninth Circle of Dante's Inferno.) This was a snow closure, warranting not letting the RFC run its course. It wasn't unanimous, because there was one valid Yes !vote, because that was cast before he engaged in the vandalism that got him banned. Thank you. I would have labeled it as a snow closure, but it was a snow closure. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:E-meter
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:E-meter. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Adminship
Thank you kindly...both for your words of encouragement and your lovely support at my RfA. I hope that I do justice to your faith in me. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Piketty
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Piketty. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

FYI
I restored the original numbers at WP:RFA/N, and tweaked the following text to hopefully emphasize more clearly that typical expectations are higher. While it's certainly empirically true that even your doubled numbers are "low", I don't think it's a good idea to change the guidance pages in ways that perpetuate expectations-ratcheting behavior at a time when getting people to run at all is a bigger problem than deterring the NOTNOW cases. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 30 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 02:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Bob Muglia
Hi. Just wanted to check-in on the GA review. You picked it up in early May, but I never heard back from you CorporateM (Talk) 18:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Balochistan, Pakistan. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 31 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 09:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

AFD Relisting
Hello Esquivalience, I noticed that you recently relisted Deborah McCallum and PaGaLGuY at AfD. In case you're not aware, the guideline at WP:Relist says that in general such debates should not be relisted more than twice, and if relisting for the third time the template should include a short explanation why the debate is considered insufficient.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  19:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The debates obviously did not have a clear consensus and that was the only issue - not much need to explain, unless the relist needs clarifying on why a close can't be conducted yet if the "head count" is towards X outcome. I can explain my judgement behind either relisting or WP:NPASR closing, but there wouldn't be much benefit to. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 19:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Abadoned GA review
Esquivalience, apparently you have abandoned your responsibilities to review Bob Muglia for GA, forcing me to reset it back into the queue. As it says on the GA review instructions page:

'''IMPORTANT: Once you start a review, you are committing to complete it in a timely manner. Do not stop half way through and just leave it. Consider reviewing only one article at a time. If you are in a situation where you absolutely cannot continue to review the article, please leave a note on the nomination talk page.'''

Please ensure that this is not repeated in the future. Thank-you. -Prhartcom (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yelp
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yelp. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 32 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 12:31, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Help with Assurant
Hello Esquivalience! I noticed you were one of the few members of WP:Finance who is still actually active. Would you be interested in collaborating to improve the article for Assurant? I have a paid COI, and I've been working sporadically with some volunteers with the end goal of creating a better article and removing the advertising banner. If you've got the time, would you mind taking a look at the page? Any suggestions you might have would be appreciated. Thanks!--FacultiesIntact (talk) 06:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Indian cities by GDP (per capita)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Indian cities by GDP (per capita). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

not sure why you marked DogecoinDark for deletion. References cited are non-bias, and all information is factual. there are no price analysis' as you commented. any other fictitious reason the page should be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunerok (talk • contribs) 14:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian financial crisis (2014–present)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian financial crisis (2014–present). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement – discussion about changing project processes



 * Hello :
 * A discussion is occurring at Change project processes regarding potential changes to the Today's articles for improvement Wikiproject. Your input is welcomed at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 11:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Uber (company)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Uber (company). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Supply-side economics
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supply-side economics. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greek government-debt crisis
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greek government-debt crisis. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Americans for Prosperity
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Americans for Prosperity. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

TAFI's List of articles



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * A discussion is occurring at the TAFI talk page regarding potential changes to the project's List of articles page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 04:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Invisalign
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Invisalign. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

AfD for Athletics at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games – Men's 100 metres
Based on your participation at the previous deletion discussion, you may be interested in the ongoing deletion discussion for Athletics at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games – Men's 100 metres which can be found at Articles for deletion/Athletics at the 2015 Southeast Asian Games – Men's 100 metres (2nd nomination). ~ RobTalk 09:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corvette leaf spring. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Infectious medicine
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Infectious medicine. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Association for Progressive Communications. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

TAFI List of articles purge, part II



 * Hello Esquivalience:


 * A discussion is occurring at the TAFI talk page regarding the removal of entries from the project's List of articles page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:23, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Google. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Biting newcomers
User:Esquivalience Nrwairport shouldn't be allowed to patrol newly created Userpage. Some kids and teens are publishing their real name and address; he tags speedy delete as advertisement on their user page. --182.66.11.30 (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Nrwairport too
I was somewhat amused to have my discussion with Nrwairport used by you as 'evidence' against them here. 220  of  Borg 18:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Plant-based diet
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Plant-based diet. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carly Fiorina. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

NBOOK RfC
Thanks for closing the RfC on the NBOOK Guideline. I needed to get a second opinion on how the folks in AfD are operating and wanted a wider opinion on if the entire Wikiproject could live by the arbitrary moving of the goal-post that goes on there. I.e., minimum 200 WorldCat entries, a handful of (very select) book reviews instead of two, college newspapers are not RS, and BKCRIT #5 does not mean what it says it means concerning the author's notability. Was hoping for more no votes, but at least I have an RfC discussion to point to now. --Cheers-- 009o9 (talk) 07:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Woolworths (supermarket)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Woolworths (supermarket). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Agar.io
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Agar.io you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tortle -- Tortle (talk) 05:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Agar.io
The article Agar.io you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Agar.io for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tortle -- Tortle (talk) 06:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Content creation
Regarding [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3ARequests_for_adminship&type=revision&diff=678333275&oldid=678316348 this comment]: I can agree that each person will have topics that they do not find interesting to write about, and that there are some topics that by their nature may be very dry, obscure, or otherwise difficult to be enthusiastic about. Nonetheless, I disagree with your characterization of content creation being one of a number of boring areas of Wikipedia, and "Jenga with words". Making contributions to an article requires research, and crafting clear, concise, and engaging text, both of which are enjoyable for some, and not just a game of trying to get everything to balance in some precarious structure. isaacl (talk) 19:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * To clarify, I was not trying to convey that content creation is boring. I was trying to convey that content creation is boring to many - some with the skill and passion for writing will find Jenga with words enjoyable and also a lot of room for creativity. But for other types of Wikipedians, Jenga with words is just Jenga with words; they find no room for creativity. <span style="color: #3BB9FF; font-style: italic; font-family: Lato, sans-serif'">Esquivalience t 19:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The comparison with Jenga implies that writing is just a task of shaking up words, stirring them, and getting them to hang just right. It's not a very good metaphor. And to say writing does not provide room for creativity is a bit odd. isaacl (talk) 20:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:College of Technology, Pantnagar
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:College of Technology, Pantnagar. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Conduit (company)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conduit (company). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:International Space Elevator Consortium
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International Space Elevator Consortium. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trypophobia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trypophobia. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

TAFI
I reviewed your nom at TAFI. Interesting. If you find time for it please review my noms at TAFI as some of them soon are running out of time without any input. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beepi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beepi. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of countries by real GDP growth rate
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of countries by real GDP growth rate. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Years Past Matter/Archive 1
The discussion was wrongly archived. Fortunately, I un-archived it. Shall I tag this for deletion? --George Ho (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Genetically modified food
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Genetically modified food. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Mop duty?
Looks like you are keeping the page neatened up at my RfA. Someone just put a long oppose !vote in the support column. Probably want to fix that? Thanks! Montanabw <sup style="color:purple;">(talk) 04:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of brightest stars
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of brightest stars. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship
Thank you for archiving discussions on this busy talk page. I'd like to request that you not archive discussions prematurely though. Sometimes discussions can seem like they are over and then are revived a week later. There is no harm in letting them exist on the talk page for a bit longer until they go dormant. Liz <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 14:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Deep frying
Thank you so much for riding to the rescue of the abandoned GA candidate. I was delighted to be able to promote an article on a topic that makes all right-thinking people happy.  <font color="#0A0A2A">Tim riley <font color="#848484"> talk   19:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Volkswagen emissions violations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Volkswagen emissions violations. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Restore the deleted page - TPConnects
Seeks your assistance to restore the page TPConnects based on following references

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it is listed on International Air Transport Association (IATA) website (https://www.iata.org/whatwedo/airline-distribution/ndc/pages/default.aspx) under deployments tab and under Info Tab within Rotana Jet case study

More articles are available on the following links

http://cdn.nowmedia.co.za/NowMedia/ebrochures/TNW/Standard/TNW-Issue-2373-28October2015.pdf

http://www.ttgasia.com/article.php?article_id=26153

https://www.zawya.com/story/TPConnects_first_IT_Vendor_and_Aggregator_to_attain_dual_NDC_Level_3certification_from_IATA_for_the_latest_PADIS_Publication_152_Schemas-ZAWYA20151221062742/

http://www.travolution.co.uk/articles/2015/09/23/13514/tpconnects-unveils-new-aggregator-platform-based-on-ndc-standards.html

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tpconnects-first-airline-customer-now-134500540.html

http://tradearabia.com/news/TTN_282162.html TPConnects (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TPConnects (talk • contribs)