User talk:Essayhater

Welcome
Hello, Essayhater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Speculation based on previews
Please do not add speculation based on previews. See WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to The Biggest Loser: Couples 3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring
See discussion here. As per the WP:BRD cycle, you made a bold edit, I reverted it, and now we are discussing it. The third step is not "revert". Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)