User talk:Essencekaitlyn

Welcome!
Hello, Essencekaitlyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Martha Copp, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Martha Copp


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Martha Copp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 15:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Martha Copp
Hello, Essencekaitlyn,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Martha Copp should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Martha Copp.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your changes to Martha Copp
Hi. I've removed the long list of publications you added to Copp's article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for filling out a professor's resume. The number of publications she has written do not matter. What matters is her impact on her field and what others have written about her (I repeat, about her). Readers who are interested will look her up at Google scholar. I listed the publications that have been cited multiple times by other researchers. For help in writing articles about academic people see User:StarryGrandma/Writing an article about a professor or researcher.

In addition your version of her article was copied and pasted from Copp's faculty web page. This is plagiarism as well as copyright violation, and Wikipedia takes both very seriously. You must write entirely in your own words. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I am trying to make the case at the deletion discussion that the article should not be removed from Wikipedia. Please do not make this more difficult. StarryGrandma (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)