User talk:Establishment5

Welcome!
Hello, Establishment5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Re:User:Establishment5/sandbox
I must say it does look better than it did, with the whole article know using third person instead of first. However there is one critical flaw I still see with the article: while the article is cited and in third person tone, it still appears to lack the required notability need of a musician's article under the Notability (music) policy. Unless you can find and prove with citations that the artist meets at least one of the Notability (music) criteria, we can not accept an article for the musician on Wikipedia. Now I'll note for the record that music is not my strength on Wikipedia, so in fairness I would seek out the opinion of at least one editor at WikiProject Musicians to obtain their opinion on the sandbox article. Since the folks at Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians spend the bulk of their time dabbling with bands, solo acts, etc, they will have a better grasp of what fine tuning the article will need to get published and remain on Wikipedia. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Edits to Frederick Achom
I was contacted to improve and watch this article because of recent vandalism that has occurred. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Establishment5 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC) (UTC)
 * Per WP:PAID, if you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, you must "disclose who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship". Please also read WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE for info on how to disclose any possible conflict of interest. Shearonink (talk) 23:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

This was the Fiverr user who contacted me: fiverr.com/dejmaster

Paid editing
Hello. I notice that you are doing paid editing on Wikipedia, something I myself have recently taken up as well. I just wanted to reach out to you to make sure you're aware of the rules around paid editing. First of all, it's not against the rules if you follow the guidelines at WP:PAID and most importantly that you always declare your paid editing status so there are no doubts and no mistakes about what is going on. Lack of declaration on edits can lead to trouble so my advice is to pay attention to the guidelines.  MPJ  -DK 00:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Dominik Kwolek concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dominik Kwolek, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dominik Kwolek


Hello, Establishment5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dominik Kwolek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:34, 28 September 2017 (UTC)