User talk:Estherneiman

Welcome!

 * }

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Natan Slifkin has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://slifkinchallenge.blogspot.com/, http://slifkin-opinions.blogspot.com/. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Estherneiman! The message from XLinkBot above is correct, please have a read of our external links guideline, or discuss your changes on the talk page. Continued addition of these links which violate the external links guidelines is disruptive to Wikipedia. Thanks,  &#91; stwalkerster &#124; talk &#93;  03:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Natan Slifkin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. There is no need for multiple external links when sufficient coverage of anti-Slifkin content is ready and available via links that are already provided -- and you have already been warned regarding this sort of activity above, and it appears as though this account had been created in order to promote an anti-Slifkin bias, seeing how your only edits are to this article. Thank you.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 00:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add a multiplicity of external links for unsubstantiated reasons, as you did at Natan Slifkin, you may be blocked from editing.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 03:32, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK  13:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Please join the discussion
I welcome you to comment at.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 03:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Block
I've blocked this account indefinitely as it was being used for disruption only, repeatedly adding and restoring links to personal websites to a BLP, in violation of WP:BLPSPS. And after it was briefly blocked it returned as an IP to make the same edits. I'll post the block notice below so you can use the link to appeal if you want to. SlimVirgin TALK |  CONTRIBS 03:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.