User talk:Estoy Aquí/arch2

WikiProject Munich
 Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?
 * You can join a Task Force.
 * You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
 * You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
 * You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
 * You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
 * You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
 * You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
 * You can help reference articles.
 * Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
 * You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.



Orphaned fair use image (Image:Allsaintspromo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Allsaintspromo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 17:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Sobre el artículo de Telefónica
Espero que puedas entenderme en español, he visto que tienes nivel 2 en tu ficha. Te escribo porque hace un tiempo hice una corrección en Telefónica indicando que era una empresa privada, y lo es, hoy he vuelto a revisar ese artículo y he comprobado que lo habías vuelto a modificar, te pido que te informes y rectifiques el artículo ya que hace mucho que Telefónica no es pública, te lo dice alguien que vive en España y que tiene una pequeña inversión en Telefónica. En el año 1997 el gobierno vendió el 20% de la compañía que quedaba en sus manos tras varias ventas anteriores, pasando la empresa a capital 100% privado.

Un saludo. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:KirO


 * Uff, caí en un False Friend, perdón por los inconvenientes, un saludo de KirO
 * 81.44.220.61 03:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:COA IRELAND.PNG

 * You maybe interested to see that the image is up for deletion and may wish to comment. It would be a pity to delete. Djegan 14:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox central bank
Hi,

I'm about to do a large scale change on Infobox central bank. You can see the new code at User:Chochopk/Template sandbox 2 and examples at User:Chochopk/Template sandbox 1. They may not look so different, but this is to reduce code clutter and bring consistency with Infobox Currency and Infobox Country. It also fixes some alignment issue.

I would also like to remove printer and mint. I know I'm repeating myself, but I still think manufacturing the physical currency is just a minor function of a central bank. Determining how much more to print is is a more important task, which is independent of who prints the notes. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 15:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * According to the timestamp of your message, you probably read my sandbox at a time when the wikipedia site-wide CSS was broken. The result was infoboxes being too wide and the font being too big. The timing couldn't be any worse. Now it's fixed. You're welcome to look again. If it's not in my sandbox, that means I probably move it to the real template. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

PDF-image-ripping skills
Yep, it's time again -- there's finally been an announcement in the OJotEU on new Monegasque euro coins, cf. here. Thanks a lot in advance! &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 13:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Languages
Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!!  Abdullah Geelah 13:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 

Evanescence covers
All I know is that this issue was discussed with a couple of admins, who stated that scanned images are equated with digital photographs, and that they do not fall under fair-use, similar to how you can take a photograph of any other product (vehicle, sofa, etc) and it be a valid exclusion of FU. Perhaps CC-by-SA is the wrong tag, but I'm convinced by both the above statements and by that logic, that these are valid images. No offense, but I'm getting somewhat perturbed by the rediculous amount of contradictory information presented here. -- Huntster  T • @ • C 18:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but after discussing this on IRC this morning with both regular users and admins, I'm at the point of throwing up my hands in disgust, especially with one of the closing statements by an admin being "Admins don't know any more about copyright than you do." While it may be true, this is a disturbing statement to make, as it calls into question the ability to accurately assess the licensing.  I frankly don't care anymore if you nominate every bloody image for speedy; perhaps the articles would be better off without any images, free or fair-use (a policy which I consider to be a joke, given the number of holes and the vagueness in which it is presented).  Anyway, do whatever you want, I'm quite finished caring.  In any case, I'll toss up a message on the main Ev article, and I suggest it might be a good idea for you to do the same. --  Huntster  T • @ • C 20:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey!!
Did you do an Anglo-Saxon translation of the name Jimbo Wales?? Do you mind if you can make one for my page: User:Leor Natanov/In many languages? You don't have to if you want to. If you do, then thanks!! Leor Natanov 00:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Ireland links in Kyrill (storm)
I accidentally reverted your edits because I was reverting Tp1024 at the time, and your edits were added to the article while I was reading the old revision, so I didn't notice them while reverting. Sorry about that, tends to happen on often-edited articles. --doco ( ☏ ) 14:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Template:Ireland-bio-stub
Hi RedHotHeat, I've reverted your edits to the Irish bio template. The reason is that this template is used for people from Ireland, both before and after partition, in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. For this reason the flag of the Republic of Ireland is not suitable. Hope you understand. &laquo; Keith t/e&raquo; 17:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

EEA
Well there are a couple of reasons I reverted really but the little box doesn't allow for enough explanation. The first one is that the addition looked like it had just been tacked on the end and didn't read very well. The second reason is that I slightly misunderstood the article on the EEA on this site and thought that the EU laws were automatically extended to cover the EFTA countries. But the first reason still stands.-Localzuk(talk) 16:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I think to explain it adequately would be giving it too much focus. As a whole, it is not that big of an event in the Windows XP history so the brief explanation regarding the eea should do I think.-Localzuk(talk) 16:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Unilever.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Unilever.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:ÉdithCresson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ÉdithCresson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 06:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ecb.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Ecb.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Europol.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Europol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Juli (band) translation
I am almost done with the translation of the article in case you want to take a look at it now...--VeronikaMM 12:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I had noticed that. I kept meaning to leave a message, but kept forgetting, so I'm doing it now. It looks so much better now, so thanks a lot for translating it. It's really MUCH better - Рэд хот (t • c • e) 15:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the feedback. I know I am not done yet, but I think I should be able to finish off the translation by tomorrow and so someone should be able to proofread it then.--VeronikaMM 16:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Noëlquedubonheur.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Noëlquedubonheur.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Newcommoneuro1.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Newcommoneuro1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:3HK.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:3HK.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 09:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CBSeye.svg
On 6/14/2006, you uploaded the "CBS eye" portion of the network logo. Your upload summary, however, provides no source for the image that you uploaded, nor did you provide a fair use rationale for the image. Administrators are going through all non-free logos and tagging them for deletion if they are not properly documented. Yours was tagged, and will be deleted when an administrator gets to it through the backlog. Do you have the exact source for the file (i.e., the actual file location on the website)? If so, I can provide the necessary fair use rationale to prevent the logo from being deleted. Thanks much. dhett (talk • contribs) 04:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kierstenwarren.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kierstenwarren.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 21:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Aerlinguslogo.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aerlinguslogo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Aerlinguslogo.svg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aerlinguslogo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dansmafusee.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Dansmafusee.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Glambia.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Glambia.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:FG-s5-r2.jpg
I have tagged Image:FG-s5-r2.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add article name to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex  22:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Big Brother
In the same way as you outlined that Madonna is more commonly known by her first name, so are the Big Brother contestants. Your edit was done with absolutely no discussion on the talk page before hand in order to reach a consensus and with you having made no other contrubutions to the page. Triangle e 21:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:FG-s5-r2.jpg
I have tagged Image:FG-s5-r2.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Bigr Tex  19:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:FG-s5-r2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:FG-s5-r2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Great Hunger
Hi, you participated in a recent straw poll at Talk:The Great Hunger on a possible name change. Most of the editors that participated in the recent polls were invited to participate in the most recent, but as far as I can see you were not. Your opinion should still be heard. The editor who opened the new poll said this to the other participants. "This is a friendly notice that I have opened another straw poll, this time to find the names that editors are most opposed to. If you know of anybody who did not vote in the last straw poll, but who has an interest in the name debate, please feel free to pass this on. Scolaire (talk)". Regards Wotapalaver (talk) 13:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * PS. The poll closed 36 hours ago. The result was move to Great Famine (Ireland). I posted friendly notice to everybody who took part in this poll (you didn't) on June 18, but Wotapalaver apparently "didn't have time" to pass it on until just now.  Confused?  I sure am!  Scolaire (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)