User talk:EternalKnight

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Prod
1. Being unreleased is not an excuse for low quality (it's been in development for years) 2. Being modelled after a notable game is not notability 3. It has like, two lines of important content, from years ago. from a single source. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You can't compare a fan-game to Doom; Like it or not, GoldenEye Source has a higher standard of notability than any retail release.
 * Again, I must reiterate that you don't get notable from using another name. You get notable from having multiple secondary sources establishing said notability. You absolutely cannot compare Wolfenstein to Wolfenstein 3D - Wolfenstein is a game released by one of the top publishers in gaming today, while GoldenEye is, again, a fan game. They're not apples and oranges, they're apples and bears. No article has a free pass just because they don't have notability yet.
 * An article doesn't warrant existing just because people go to Wikipedia to find information on something, nor does it allow people to make articles for the purpose of teaching people about something. It has to be important enough to be included, and that means reliable secondary sources, which that article lacks. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)