User talk:EthanFDavis/sandbox

Muhammad Saqib Nadeem's peer review
The lead section explains in detail the role of attorney general. But the same also discusses about the current attorney's accomplishments before going on the explain more about the office of attorney general themself. A possible way to make it better would be to move Wasden's accomplishments after explanation of the attorney general details. The start of the paragraph also takes work from the original article. The content is descriptive but lacks proper formatting and citations. A Lot of the content also seems taken from the main wikipedia page. The tone is quite balanced and unbiased and seems to focus on facts rather than opinions. The sources used in the article are from the official government websites. This makes the work more credible. The content does have one or two grammatical errors in the start, although can be fixed easily. However, the lack of proper formatting and headings make it difficult to read, and confusing at times.