User talk:Ethan Della Rocca/sandbox

Peer Review
The Epircureanism draft does a really good job of placing the information in the context of the debate around it. In the religion section especially, you do a good job of detailing the two positions and saying where the academic consensus is. The lead section for the ataraxia article could maybe use a bit more detail - something about how achieving ataraxia is the general goal of most philosophies would be a good point. A note that says the sections that follow are describing how ataraxia is portrayed in different schools of philosophy would also help the article flow. Overall, though, the information is detailed, seems to be well-sourced, and presented very clearly!Talia298 (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Great! Thanks for the input! Ethan Della Rocca (talk) 01:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ethan, I just wrote a detailed review of your Epicureanism draft in your sandbox. Sorry that it is a bit last minute. Hope you can check it out, and overall I was very impressed by it. Great job! Sissizheng (talk) 04:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Great! thanks for the input! As I work back over the article I'll make sure to address your points. Ethan Della Rocca (talk) 00:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)