User talk:Ethanhaisma/Veterinary ethics

Peer Review
Lead: Looking at the lead I was able to get great information from the Veterinary Ethics and the five main topics that create these ethics. It also links several different articles of information. There are two citations included which provide good context on the lead explanation. After reading the rest of the article I feel the same. I feel there is a good reflection on the importance and gives a good understanding of Veterinary Ethics and what they are. I feel that the lead is balanced pretty well and has a good flow of information. I was able to get a good understanding and didn't feel that there was any redundancy.

Structure: I enjoyed the structure of the article. I like that the lead and the incorporation into everyday practice are separated and labeled. I think this helps build a better understanding of the purpose of the article. It was in good order and was easy to read. The only change that could be suggested it to put the lead first but in all honesty it works either way.

Balance: Each section's length is proportional according to the significance of each section and understanding of the article's subject. Each section that is included in the article seems relevant and provides readers with information that allows them to know what Veterinary Ethics are and what they mean. Nothing directly seems off-topic, and everything seems to have a connection to the topic in one way or another. The article does reflect all perspectives in the included citations. I don't feel there is many other ways of viewpoints. Because it is a direct ethics code, it does not need to convince anyone or make anyone draw specific conclusions. It is a standard of general practice.

Neutrality: I do think I could probably guess that the perspective of the author views these basics in ethics as something positive. I don't think that is necessarily bad. But also I could see where one wouldn't be able to see this when reading. Because it's an article on the code of ethics it's something to stand by without questionability. Most of it was in a neutral tone, one place that helped that stood out was the term “determining”. Well, this may not seem like a neutral tone, but it is in the way it is being used. I didn’t notice spots where there was anything claimed on behalf of any group of people. The article seems to focus mainly on positive information and the positivity behind these ethics. The article is more informative the anything.

Sources: Both sources are from reliable sources. These sources are attributed through the article and are not overused. Each source is included and accurately presented in the article

Takeaway:I enjoyed learning about this topic. It seemed that I understood that there are those unspoken rules behind a job, but being able to read what each is and consider how it is placed into the overall aspect of Veterinary work. I was impressed with how it was presented and how smooth/easy it was to read. I don’t have many suggestions to be completely honest. However, I believe there is some more information that could be added to the article's body and information. One thing I would take from this peer review is to maybe section my lead and my main article body into separate pieces and use the headers to my advantage.

I enjoyed reading your article on Veterinary ethics. I never realized there was such importance behind these ethics. I assumed most of it was just common knowledge. But upon reading your article I was able to get a grasp on the fact there is a lot more included within these ethics and their upholding. I was impressed with how it was presented and how smooth/easy it was to read. I don’t have many suggestions to be completely honest. However, I believe there is some more information that could be added to the article's body and information along with another source. One thing I would say is to add more outside of the lead. The lead was very strong and the following article did not provide as much subsidence as the lead did. I think you could even get away with making each ethic a paragraphed explanation. But overall it was very well done. Hunt212 (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)