User talk:Ethanhart129

Unspecified source/license for File:Gene Wilder and Johnny Depps Willy Wonka.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gene Wilder and Johnny Depps Willy Wonka.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gene Wilder and Johnny Depps Willy Wonka.png


A tag has been placed on File:Gene Wilder and Johnny Depps Willy Wonka.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Wilder's comments about Depp
Hey, nice addition. Does the book mention when exactly Wilder made those comments? I guess it would be interesting to know whether it was prior to the 2013 "insult" comment or after. Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 09:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello! The book I cited was published in 2006 so it was much before the "insult" comment. It did indicate that it was after the film's release though. Ethanhart129 (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nurse Jackie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
Hey, did you mean to remove the bit about Amber Heard's counsel? I see you didn't address it in your edit summary. Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 20:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I did, I didn't think it was really too noteworthy that it was simply mentioned in the courtroom. It wasn't a question specific about Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, they just mentioned it as an example. If you feel otherwise, you're more than welcome to restore that factoid. Ethanhart129 (talk) 20:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No, that seems reasonable. Just making sure in case it was by mistake. Throast  { { ping }} me! (talk &#124; contribs) 21:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)