User talk:Ethosdata

December 2017
Hello, I'm Peaceray. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edits to 1895 Wilcox rebellion seemed less than neutral and have been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can discuss this on Talk:1895 Wilcox rebellion. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 1895 Wilcox rebellion. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1895 Wilcox rebellion, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:34, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 1895 Wilcox rebellion shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:35, 13 December 2017 (UTC)