User talk:Eucrm

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collaboration Vouchers (February 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Collaboration Vouchers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Collaboration_Vouchers Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Collaboration_Vouchers reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Collaboration Vouchers


A tag has been placed on Draft:Collaboration Vouchers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/collaboration-vouchers-ben-heslop. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Adding your own commentary
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry what are you referring to exactly? Eucrm (talk) 10:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Australian Aboriginal identity, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Public employment service, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Eucrm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice. I suppose I will have to abandon my efforts or spend serious time doing the research. Eucrm (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:OR and WP:RS
If you are finding things difficult at this point - try getting a very good handle on WP:OR and WP:RS - before reacting to other editors in any way, or reverting their edits in any way. It is imperative for you to understand that unreferenced material is not acceptable, and that WP:NOT and WP:ABOUT are clearly understood. Thanks, take care... JarrahTree 10:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks JarrahTree *sigh* I guess I'll need to do the work. Don't know how you justify policing people like me without being paid. Eucrm (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The psychic damage is permanent, and you need to wash your mouth out/rinse your keyboard in relation to renumeration, that's quite verbotten. Never identify yourself as anything on wiki - every edit is always easily found - the smaller your edit count the easier to find.  My gaffes are multidunious if not numerous, hidden under sheer volume of edits.  The work requires verifiable and accessible reliable sources.  Allusions to anything without sources are usually zapped mercilessly, specially after warnings/information about wp:OR have been given.JarrahTree 11:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

COI
Hi, you've disclosed a conflict of interest (COI) on your userpage, for Collaboration Vouchers / Collaboration vouchers. You shouldn't therefore have created that article directly in the main article space yourself, but should have gone through the AfC review process instead (like you did initially; I remember reviewing your draft a couple of months ago). I should really move it back to drafts now, but hesitate to do so as the article has been already reviewed and accepted by a fellow new page reviewer. Please bear this in mind going forward, though. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)