User talk:Eugenious monk

License tagging for File:PioneerARHUD.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PioneerARHUD.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MicroVision, Inc.


A tag has been placed on MicroVision, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. shoy (reactions) 20:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MicroVision, Inc. (April 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MicroVision, Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  22:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:MicroVision, Inc. has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MicroVision, Inc.. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  23:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:MicroVision, Inc. has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MicroVision, Inc.. Thanks! SwisterTwister  talk  17:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MicroVision, Inc. has been accepted
 MicroVision, Inc., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Primefac (talk) 16:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Stop the edit war
This is just a kind reminder that adding self published material is against Wikipedia's policy. I will no longer revert your edits for the rest of a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.40.231 (talk) 20:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:MicroVision, Inc., you may be blocked from editing. ''Please, do not remove comments on talk pages by others - see WP:TPO for why this is unacceptable. If you are engaged in an edit war, you may both get blocked. Please also review Wikipedia's guideline on undisclosed conflict of interests, since this seems to be your situation. Thanks,'' RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

unblock
In addition, I am not nor have ever been a sockpuppet. I have only this one account since I joined years ago. I contribute to Wikipedia each year. It is unfortunate that my well meaning intents have been met with continual resistance. Until the past months since I was blocked, I was a custodian for the MicroVision article. I created the original stub and gradually added content and hyperlinks to relevant topics. Many of those links have since been deleted by others. I find it difficult to understand why. Eugenious monk (talk) 15:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * What might the Eugenious Philantropist account have to do with you? Note that you are free to use your company website to provide up to the minute current information about your company and what it considers to be its history. Wikipedia is primarily interested in what others say about your company, not what it says about itself. 331dot (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If your account was compromised, it will need to remain blocked, as we have no way to know who is sitting at the computer. 331dot (talk) 16:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

I have no idea who is "Eugenious Philanthropist". The comment "Wikipedia is primarily interested in what others say about your company, not what it says about itself." is uninterpretable. I was asked to change my password. Wikipedia is turning out to be littered with scam artists, I'd say.

Speedy deletion nomination of MicroVision, Inc.


A tag has been placed on MicroVision, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles_for_deletion/Microvision_Incorporated. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yammie2009 (talk) 06:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of MicroVision, Inc. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MicroVision, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MicroVision, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Yammie2009 (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC)