User talk:Euglenos sandara

Welcome

 * You seem to already know your way around, but I prefer this welcome message above the rest, and even longterm users might find help in these links. Thank you for nearly 2 years of contributions. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 16:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you.

NPOV/Incivility Warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Please refrain from making such obviously inflammatory and POV remarks. BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk) 10:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Let me ask you, "esteemed censor", if Wikipedia has neutral point of view policy, then how exactly my comments on the invading Russian forces, that are based on factual data, are considered "just wrong". And what exactly makes you special here to judge what is right and what is wrong? At least you should provide clearer argument for your point and then present me absurd threats. I am ready for dialogue. Euglenos sandara (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I may be a very new editor, but I fail to see any incivility in the talk page post by @Euglenos sandara and the NPOV sentiment, while an opinion and not necessarily pointed towards specific article improvement, doesn't ask for or indicate any editing of the article, refs, or otherwise, in a POV manner. The editor posting this warning seems to be using it very broadly and in a heavy-handed manner. I don't think the talk page comment warrants any warnings posts like this. King keudo (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Then I suggest you re-read the talk page. Not only does he go on a completely inappropriate propaganda-esque tangent, on a site that is supposedly founded on the principal of WP:NPOV, he in the same statement made baseless claims of "genocide", and also referred to Russians as "orcs", a derogatory, dehumanizing slur. What about that is civil? BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk) 19:54, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Wow, you might want to read up on WP:CIVIL and then maybe explain which editors were being attacked,insulted, or otherwise made to feel unwelcome or rejected. In fact, you might want to check your own civility level; a comment regarding a nonsensical comparison to orcs and zombies in a section about zombies, anyways, and you decide to just bludgeon people with warning templates and immediately saying they will be banned due to....not being uncivil to anyone or trying to intimidate people on a talk page. You need to relax some, friend. King keudo (talk) 02:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Copying and pasting my response from the talk page: What's going on in Ukraine might be an illegal war, but it is in no way a genocide. You should look up what actually constitutes a "genocide", it's frankly demeaning to actual victims of genocide to call it that. In any case, Wikipedia is not the place for pointless POV opinions, and derogatory, dehumanizing slurs. So I suggest you rescind your comment, Euglenos sandara, before I report you for breaching one of Wikipedia's core pillars. BUZZLIGHTYEAR99 (talk) 19:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * First of all, there is genocidal intent and there is a whole Wikipedia article on it, I simply do not care whether you support it or not, that's based just on your personal morality, if you have any. First of all, I used the talk page to make a reply and to provide my opinion on the subject matter, and by that standard you cannot impose your indoctrination over someone else's view (that is, indeed, contradicting everything you've mentioned up to this point about the neutrality). I did not make any edits to the article whatsoever. By calling my comments propaganda will not further the discussion. And by referring to the orcs I only talked about the Russian soldiers, not civilians, although they are guilty to some extent as well. Anyone with a basic understanding of semantics will get that. And how about your comment denying the Russian agression, that is way more dehumanizing and "inflammatory", as you might use. When it comes to rescinding my comment, I would gladly appreciate you explaining what do you mean by that. As far as I know, deleting archives is against Wikipedia policies and I have no obligation to do it either. Euglenos sandara (talk) 20:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Talk pages are not the place to write your personal opinions about a topic. They are for improving the article. The policy is WP:NOTAFORUM. Also see below. Mellk (talk) 02:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * This clearly counts as WP:SOAPBOXING so please don't do it again. In future such comments may get removed per WP:TPG. Mellk (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Noted, but it was a glorious moment indeed. Euglenos sandara (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

A song
Hi Euglenos sandara, I would like to share with you this nice song that I have found. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot_L_P-_CGw. - 🇺🇦 Слава🇺🇦Україні 🇺🇦 Героям🇺🇦Слава🇺🇦 (talk)🇺🇦 22:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I appreciate it, cheers! Euglenos sandara (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Україна переможе! - 🇺🇦 Слава🇺🇦Україні 🇺🇦 Героям🇺🇦Слава🇺🇦 (talk)🇺🇦 22:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * До кінця, до перемоги! Слава Україні! Euglenos sandara (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Euglenos sandara
User:Euglenos sandara, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Euglenos sandara and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Euglenos sandara during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 02:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)


 * If my opinions are truly welcome, you wouldn't have issued an unecessary deletion nomination that is motivated purely by your personal beliefs (as evident by the userboxes) and usupported by like-minded biased justice warriors. Besides that, who is it that decides what content is divisive and what is not. How do you even proceed with such vague definitions? But hey, it is a public wiki, so no surprise here. Euglenos sandara (talk) 02:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 02:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking such a great interest in my personal beliefs. Euglenos sandara (talk) 16:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Prodraxis For your information, if the administrator didn't present any arguments for the block and didn't even bother to counter-review my arguments I raised in the appeal, it is only reasonable to conclude that the decision may be influenced by personal bias. Euglenos sandara (talk) 14:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Lourdes 06:21, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Euglenos, you may have varied personal beliefs, but this encyclopedia is not the place to promote them. I have blocked you for expressing here that you will continue the same line of thought. Once you confirm that you will not repeat such aggressive beliefs on Wikipedia, use the process mentioned above for an unblock, and any other administrator may unblock you without checking with me in case they are satisfied with your confirmation. Thank you, Lourdes  06:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)


 * 331dot You have not provided any arguments at all. Furthermore, the assertion that 'Wikipedia is better off with you blocked' seems to be driven solely by personal bias, which is highly unprofessional for an administrator of any website. This contradicts the impression given by your infobox, as you do not seem to be assuming good faith in this specific situation. As I mentioned, I am open to conceding not posting my personal beliefs on my userpage and I respectfully ask to reevaluate my appeal with a neutral perspective and present a reasonable rationale for the suggested block. User:Euglenos sandara (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * My opinion is not based on "personal bias" but simply what I read in front of me. As I noted, perhaps another admin will see it differently. Believe it or not, someone making a decision that goes against you does not necessarily mean "bias" is involved. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If you had read what was in front of you, you would have at least explained the reasons for maintaining the block instead of resorting to personal comments. No offense. Euglenos sandara (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)


 * , please post your fresh unblock appeal below as the above one has been closed by the earlier administrator. I will suggest that you simply stick to the last part that you wrote (about agreeing not to write these beliefs further on your pages or anywhere on Wikipedia). I will also suggest not to berate administrators coming here to assess your request. Thank you for considering this suggestion. Lourdes  14:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I apologize, I didn't see this comment, so I sent you an email. Thank you, I will. Euglenos sandara (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Euglenos sandara, please outline why the edits that led to this block were wrong, what you will do in the future to avoid these mistakes again, and which specific articles do you intend to edit if unblocked. Z1720 (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the comment, I will update my appeal. Euglenos sandara (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Please post your answers below as it will help me keep track of your responses. You were also blocked for your comments towards editors after they reported your user name and expressed their concerns. Some of this behaviour is outlined in the ANI report linked above. Please address that issue, describe why it was wrong and what you will do in the future to avoid that mistake again. Z1720 (talk) 14:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Um, I didn't report Euglenos' username or anything. I rather tagged their user page for MfD due to it containing quite a bit of polemical content and they appeared to be inactive for several months. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 14:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have been more clear with my language. I was referring to the ANI thread above, when you reported their user page and Euglenos sandara's responses, as indicated in that ANI. Z1720 (talk) 15:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Before I proceed with the update, I need some clarifications. What specific answers do I need to include in my response? Also, this is the first time where I've been informed that my account was blocked partially due to comments towards editors. My intention was to express concerns about potential bias within the allegations, rather than to offend anyone. However, I am puzzled as to how such an expression could lead to a blocking action. Euglenos sandara (talk) 15:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Please refer to the ANI thread that was opened about your edits on your user page and at the MfD. It can be found on this archive page. These edits also contributed to the disruptive edits that led to your block. Z1720 (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the link, I have updated my appeal. Euglenos sandara (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Do I need to submit a new appeal, or is it sufficient to update the existing one? If you have any suggestions on how to make my message-apology clearer, I would welcome your insights. My goal is to ensure that my message is easily understood by you and anyone reviewing the appeal. Euglenos sandara (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Please submit a new appeal instead of adding to your old one. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 15:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * At this point, it looks desperate enough even for a practical nihilist, but I will try. Euglenos sandara (talk) 16:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TLE
Template:TLE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 25 December 2023 (UTC)