User talk:Eulalefty

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  10:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

A summary of some important policies and guidelines

 * Article content should be relevant. Just because a concept is mentioned in a book or movie does not mean the book or movie should be mentioned in that concept's article.
 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.  In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
 * Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
 * We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.

Ian.thomson (talk) 13:33, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Reverting
You recently reverted here without giving a reason either in an edit summary or on article talk. I have removed that again and started a talk page discussion see Talk:Evolution. Please discuss there.

Always explain your edits to Wikipedia articles with a brief descriptive edit summary. If your edits are challenged and removed, go to the talk page and discuss, see WP:BRD. Vsmith (talk) 21:04, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  21:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  20:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  18:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  13:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  09:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  19:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 --Peace world  09:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)