User talk:Eulerfan1999

June 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bodo people, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Joshua Projects is not considered reliable as per WP:RSN. Yu can check there.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Boro people—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Bodo language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Austronesier (talk) 10:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Magars, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Magar language wiki is a source of citetion itself majority of people speaks Nepali(khaskura) as their mother tongue. Eulerfan1999 (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Your recent editing history at Boro people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Stop edit warring. The Bodo figures in the census 2011 link is the language group which includes Kacharis, and others. Note that the census includes Rajbanshi, Chakma and Hajong among others in the Bengali group. And a lot more in the Hindi group, including Bhojpuri, Mewati, Garhwali, etc. If we keep the group numbers, then the language figures will be meaningless. This can't happen. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Mech people
I have reverted your edits on Mech people. Please look at the Talk page there to see that this issue has been settled. Chaipau (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

'Mech' vs 'Mech-Kachari'
All 'Mech' peoples i.e., Mech people of 'West Bengal' speaks Bodo as their mother tongue And identify themselves as Bodo/boro But All 'Mech-kachari' are partially Kacharies and different than 'Mech'. So New page should be created soon. Eulerfan1999 (talk) 20:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I have asked you to discuss this issue in the talk page since this has already been settled with references in place. If you keep reverting, I shall have to report you at the ANI.  Chaipau (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)