User talk:Euroarti

Your submission at Articles for creation: PARTNER trial (May 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Euroarti/PARTNER trial.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hasteur&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

Hasteur (talk) 14:27, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your draft article, User:Euroarti/PARTNER trial


Hello Euroarti. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "PARTNER trial".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C679 19:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

SPA /COI
Looking at your contributions, your account is what we call a WP:SPA (please read that) and you may have a conflict of interest with regard to the subjects you have written about.

Hello, Euroarti. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Would you please declare any relationship you have with the subjects you have written about? Thanks Jytdog (talk) 05:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * you are back to editing today, and you have not responded here. I am hoping you will be reasonable and talk here so we don't have to escalate this - would you please respond?  thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * you are back to editing today, and you have not responded here. please reply.  Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 05:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Simultaneous left ventricular and aortic pressure tracings.png
Thanks for uploading File:Simultaneous left ventricular and aortic pressure tracings.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Phonocardiograms from normal and abnormal heart.png
Thanks for uploading File:Phonocardiograms from normal and abnormal heart.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve.png
Thanks for uploading File:Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Issues
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Some of the images you have uploaded have copyright issues such as the one from here
 * 2) We also have an article on aortic stenosis which is more or less than same as aortic valve stenosis. I have moved your additions to your user page. Would recommend you use them to update the aortic stenosis article. Best

Copyright issues

 * We can remove the images, no problem Doc James  (talk · contribs · email)
 * If you own the images than you can release them under an open license. We just need to verify that you own them. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 05:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:02, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This image is from  a copyrighted source by Catherine Otto.
 * This image is from  among others with now evidence it is free
 * This image is from  among others with no evidence it is free
 * As all your images appear to be copyright infringement I will delete them. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Some are from Medtronic and if you work for them / have permission from them, than we can restore some of the images in question. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Coat tract
We already had an article on aortic valve replacement yet you created a new one here Aortic_Valve_Replacement_(AVR) Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for copyright issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * You have been blocked until such time we can clarify just exactly what is going on. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia. We have compiled a list of guidance for students and new editors:


 * 1) Use high quality sources for medical content. This is described at WP:MEDRS. High quality sources include review articles (note this is not the same as peer reviewed), position statements from national and internationally recognized bodies (think CDC, WHO, NICE, FDA, etc), and major medical textbooks. Lower quality sources may be removed.
 * 2) References go after not before punctuation (see WP:MOS)
 * 3) We use very few capital letters and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
 * 4) Do not use the url from the inside net of your university library. The rest of the world cannot see it.
 * 5) If you use textbooks we need page numbers.
 * 6) Please format your references as explained at WP:MEDHOW or like the ones already in the article. This is simple once you get the PMID / ISBN.
 * 7) Every sentence can be referenced. We reference more densely than other sources.
 * 8) Never "copy and paste" from sources. We run copy and paste detection software on new edits.
 * 9) Section order typically follows the instructions here at WP:MEDMOS
 * 10) Please talk to us. Wikipedia works by collaboration and this takes place on the talk pages of both articles and user.

Again welcome and thank you for joining us.

P.S. Please share this with your fellow learners and instructors.

James Heilman a.k.a User:Doc James MD, CCFP(EM), Wikipedian Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine University of British Columbia

and

The Team at WikiProject Medicine Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Issues with your edits
Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) They changed the ordering so it no longer followed WP:MEDMOS
 * 2) It reduced the lead from 4 paragraphs, not sure why. Please read WP:LEAD
 * 3) It replaced a 2014 English review with a older review in Polish ( we should use En references generally if possible)
 * 4) You introduced a section on "etiology" when we already had a section on "causes". The two words mean the same
 * 5) The picture you added appears to be from here . We are lacking evidence that you own it and therefore are allowed to release it under an open license.
 * 6) References are not formatted much of the time
 * This material does not pertain to symptoms "ESC guidelines also suggest that exercise testing either by measuring blood pressure and assessing symptoms during treadmill exercise or “exercise stress echocardiography, may provide prognostic information in asymptomatic severe AS”. As such, physicians should consider these diagnostic tools when faced with patients who they suspect may have asymptomatic severe AS." Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 12:16, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Me and my friend who is helping me just edit that articles, sorry for not clarifying. Euroarti (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * So you both use this account or was he the other account User:Ehrahn? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Continueing to add copyright material
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 weeks for copyright issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

I have blocked you again as you continue to add copyrighted material to Wikipedia such as Please advice regarding what you are trying to do? If you own the copyright to this material I can help you with getting it into Wikipedia. Please respond here. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 
 * 


 * Hello! We're trying to edit the articles to suit more up to date information. I am new to editing so your help would be really appreciated. I see that you are very well-versed in Wikipedia and would like your expertise for us to update the info.Euroarti (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Who are you all working with? The concern is that the images you are adding are copyrighted. Do you own the copyright to them?
 * Also in these edits you took the lead of the article which was based on 2014 sources and replaced them with 2003 and 2006 sounces and a ref from Mount Sinai? Not exactly an update.  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:23, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

We thought that the images would give the article more life because this is just text. In the future, we'll ensure that any images we select will respect wikipedia image's rule. Could we work with you on the text for editing? Also, could you help us lift the block? Thanks for your help, Euroarti (talk) 13:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Who is the "we" you speak of? What text changes do you wish to make? I am happy to discuss and have provided you with some reading material above. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, Ehrahn is my friend helping me but we would edit from only one account from now on if that helps. We just want to edit some sections with more up to date informations, can we edit section by section? Thank you, Euroarti (talk) 13:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You each need to use your own account. Sure we can work on some sections. How about this one Aortic_stenosis It requires work. You can work on it below. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * By the way is this a school assignment? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 14:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Medication
The effect of statins on the progression of AS is unclear. The latest trials do not show any benefit in slowing AS progression, but did demonstrate a decrease in ischemic cardiovascular events.

In general, medical therapy has relatively poor efficacy in treating aortic stenosis. However, it may be useful to manage commonly coexisting conditions that correlate with aortic stenosis:
 * Any angina is generally treated with beta-blockers and/or calcium blockers. Nitrates are contraindicated due to their potential to cause profound hypotension in aortic stenosis.
 * Any hypertension is treated aggressively, but caution must be taken in administering beta-blockers.
 * Any heart failure is generally treated with digoxin and diuretics, and, if not contraindicated, cautious administration of ACE inhibitors.

While observational studies demonstrated an association between lowered cholesterol with statins and decreased progression, a randomized clinical trial published in 2005 failed to find any effect on calcific aortic stenosis. A 2007 study did demonstrate a slowing of aortic stenosis with the statin rosuvastatin.

No, it's not a school assessment. I agree with you about Aortic_stenosis section. It will need more work. We were thinking about removing it and add more SUBHEADER under the Management's HEADER. So we would have:

Balloon valvuloplasty
Could we add the text edit in those sections? Euroarti (talk) 14:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Medical management / statins can basically be dealt with under the heading "medications" IMO.   Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 14:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes we could merge these two into one section if clearer. The copy is ready, please let me know if we could work together to update those sections. Euroarti (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "the copy is ready"? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 15:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

The copy that we would like to update. Euroarti (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The version you would like to update is here yes. You have provided some headings above. That is all I see. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 15:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Euroarti, please respond to my question above about conflict of interest. Your not answering, is a pretty clear sign that you are editing in violation of the Terms of Use.  If you are, it is not fatal -- it is fixable by disclosing and working with us on this.  Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)