User talk:Eurocrows123

Welcome!
Hello, Eurocrows123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 03:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Divya Khosla Kumar, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you.  City O f  Silver  03:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Divya Khosla Kumar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 23:18, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * these are the references.Where she herself stated her age.
 * https://www.imdb.com/title/tt16986420/
 * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/I-came-to-Mumbai-to-achieve-something-and-not-to-get-married-Divya-Khosla-Kumar/articleshow/27024589.cms
 * I don't know how to put this in the article. May be you can help. This is a clear case of age fraud. She did her first music album at the age of 20 in 2000 album name Aiyyo Rama
 * I don't know how Wikipedia accepted her Year of birth as 1987. This clearly shows how it can be manipulated and all ten information shown are not true. Eurocrows123 (talk) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The Internet Movie Database and The Times of India are not reliable sources. Please see WP:IMDB and WP:TOI. Geniac (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * this is how stubborn you are.This is inhuman.I'm she'll shocked. In the Wikipedia page itself it's mentioned that she she started working at the age of 20.Sje did her first music album in 2000. Its clearly mentioned. Are you guys uneducated or you are doing this deliberately.I've no words. I'm just finding out a reason. You are contradicting whatever had been mentioned in the page itself. Did Divya khosla kumar gave her birth certificate to you. Does se looks 12 years in the video released in 2000.?? What sources are credible to you then. No imdb, no articles on web then How do you define reliable sources. I'm sure you have been hired by Wikipedia to stop genuine edits and everything.
 * I'm letting others now and will write an article to enlighten people how Wikipedia manipulated articles. Its very clear someone else is stopping from this being published. She is the wife of the Ceo of the biggest industry in Music. I'm really stunned. Educate yourselves please start your schooling once again. I'm really sorry. Eurocrows123 (talk) 04:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Please cease your insults and disparaging comments about other users. They are personal attacks, and are unacceptable on Wikipedia. Please read No personal attacks. Geniac (talk) 10:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In the Wikipedia page itself it's mentioned that she she started working at the age of 20. If that's sourced to the Times of India, there either needs to be a better source, or it needs to come out of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thats how clear it is. We get to know the age of these celebrities through their Birthday being celebrated and through articles. No one submits Their birth certificate to Wikipedia. Suppose Tom Cruises birthday is celebrated on this particular day. We get the month and day from that and for year we find our through articles.
 * Now in an interview she herself stated her age as 32 in 2013
 * https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/I-came-to-Mumbai-to-achieve-something-and-not-to-get-married-Divya-Khosla-Kumar/articleshow/27024589.cms
 * And in other reliable forum as well.
 * https://wikibio.in/divya-khosla-kumar/
 * https://biographywiki.net/divya-khosla-kumar/
 * https://yourwikibio.com/divya-khosla-kumar/
 * https://trendgyan.com/divya-khosla-kumar/
 * There's absolutely no doubt how Wikipedia and it's editors are playing dumb here.
 * This is a fact which is being stated in a fact based website. This boils my brain to the core as to how ignorant things can get.
 * Astonishing!!!!!!! Eurocrows123 (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The operative word is reliable. The prevailing community opinion for the Times of India is that it is not reliable. Wikibio, Biographywiki, and Yourwikibio are obviously unreliable. Looking at Trendgyan, I have doubts about its reliability, but I'd be open to a community discussion (if there hasn't been one) about it. So of five sources you proffered, that's one that, per perennial sources, has "a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable" and one of unknown merit. This is certainly not a situation where the information is widely published. And why is wide publication important? Read WP:DOB: Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources… Consensus has indicated that the standard for inclusion of personal information of living persons is higher than mere existence of a reliable source that could be verified. —C.Fred (talk) 12:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't know how we did either. That's why there is no date of birth currently mentioned in the article, since there's nothing that can be verified. —C.Fred (talk) 11:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Divya Khosla Kumar, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Divya Khosla Kumar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)