User talk:Eva Marie Everson

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. —Caesura(t) 15:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Eva Marie Everson! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Eva Marie Everson -

Proposed deletion of Eva Marie Everson‎


The article Eva Marie Everson‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Plutonium27 (talk) 02:24, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

The article has been proposed for deletion for the following reasons:
 * WP:NN (see also WP:AUTHOR) - Does not appear to satisfy the notability requirement.
 * WP:RS - No sources for any of the claims are given.
 * WP:VANITY and WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY - article does little or nothing but promote the subject and is self-authored.

All links are to Wikipedia policies, explaining in detail the various requirements for articles. Plutonium27 (talk) 02:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)