User talk:Eva gloss

History of computer animation
Hi, I saw your edits to History of computer animation and they were pretty nice. I had ben trying to get to that for a while, but now that you have made so many improvements I think it is best to leave it mostly in your hands. It still needs more touch up, but it has been much improved by your edits. By the way, if you need any help on Wikipedia issues such as guidelines, etc. please feel free to ask me - I have been around for a while. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 18:11, 10 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about the proper way to respond to message, the key issue is high quality content. Anyway, the usual way to respond to messages is at the end of the talk page in a new section. I moved your message there just to show how it is usually done. But no big deal anyway.


 * And yes, the history of computer animation was "truly awful", but we must remember that Wikipedia is a work in progress. The basic articles on cities, rivers etc. are mostly in good shape now. So if I look up something about Chicago or Paris I am pretty sure it is accurate now. But the technical articles need real help. I once looked at supercomputer, and suddenly started singing "yesterday" because it was so outdated. But after 6-9 months I cleaned it up. That is how Wikipedia works. So if you set your mind to cleaning this up in 3-6 months that is fine, and then it will be there. Once these articles are cleaned up, they hardly change. Computer generated imagery used to be awful too, but now is somewhat stable. So my suggestion is to set a 3-6 month goal, then make it happen. There is no deadline, but it is fun to clean them up. And you are doing great already. History2007 (talk) 02:47, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Antics 2-D Animation infobox screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Antics 2-D Animation infobox screenshot.png, which you've sourced to (computer screenshot). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Update

 * You need a link to the page at Antics Workshop that shows that their material is released under CC-BY-SA-3.0, or get them to e-mail in the consent form at WP:CONSENT  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. When you recently edited History of computer animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motion tracking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of computer animation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Quake and Doom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of computer animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SGI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of computer animation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Twister and Jurassic Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)