User talk:Eva in philosophy

Eva, I saw your articles on Ohari. I've made a few modifications. I hope you like them. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
 Hello Eva in philosophy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Signature_icon.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Richardcavell Good luck, and have fun. thank you for your contribution! Eva in philosophy (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Ua Zit
Hi Eva. Just to let you know that I have redirected your new stub article Ua zit to the already existing and much more comprehensive article Wadjet, since Ua Zit is but another alternative spelling or name for this ancient egyptian deity figure and there's no point having separate articles on what is essentially the same figure.

I have not transferred across any of the material you'd included in your article. If you want to try expanding a great goddess connection for this figure any further I suggest you do it at the Wadjet article, or perhaps at mother goddess. However, as with all additions it should be accompanied with reliable sources. I realise that your addition faithfully reflected what your source (Mary Pat Fisher) had to say, but bear in mind that Fisher might not be considered the most appropriate or qualified source on ancient egyptian beliefs. Also, representing her views&mdash;ie that figures from widely separated cultures (eg Egyptian & Aztec) that have never had any historical connection with one another are mere aspects of some actual entity or unifying concept&mdash;in such a matter-of-fact way could be seen as giving undue weight to an interpretation that would not be widely shared in the relevant field(s) of research. At the very least, it would need to be explicitly marked as but one interpretation, and not taken as something that represents the status-quo view. My thoughts anyway. Regards, --cjllw ʘ  TALK 02:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

i added valuable information and do not appreciate that you removed it. redirecting it would be fine Eva in philosophy (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)