User talk:Evabraud/Agamidae/Dhaynes0 Peer Review

1.	First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? The article was very thorough and did a great job of summarizing all of the findings. The conciseness of the article was impressive.

2.	What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? The article was very good but could use a little more info about the fight or flight response. The article could also use physiology to further explain the Agamidae. They would be an improvement to further clarify to the reader how the stimuli works.

3.	What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The article could use more information about the Agamidae’s physiology and its flight or fight response.

4.	Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what? Yes, I found the information about temperature change interesting because my animal also deals with temperature.

5.	Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it? Yes, I believe the article makes sense where it is currently placed

6.	Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? The article for the most part seems on topic and in the correct order.

7.	Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? No, the article does a good job of being unbiased and fair.

8.	Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." No, there is no biased phrases or words.

9.	Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? They are based of off reliable sources like scientific journals.

10.	Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. No, the article is balanced and does a good job of providing information.

11.	Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! No, all of the information has been presented honestly and accurately.