User talk:Evan.savage511

November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Suicide of Vince Foster. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''I noticed that you've been making a lot of controversial edits recently. While Wikipedia encourages editors to "be bold", we do not encourage editors to make drastic changes without providing relevant sources.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Take for example your recent change in which you alleged that the suicide of Vince Foster was in fact a murder committed by the Clinton family.

If that were a claim that you were seriously trying to make, we would expect you to provide reliable secondary sources that back up your claim. Unless you can provide sources, your changes could be interpreted as vandalism and will be undone very quickly.'' Salimfadhley (talk) 00:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Salimfadhley. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to André Cox have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ''Can you explain why you made this change? It looks like vandalism, plain and simple. If you continue to behave like this you may be prevented from editing Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andr%C3%A9_Cox&type=revision&diff=965665726&oldid=963021049&diffmode=source'' Salimfadhley (talk) 00:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Suicide of Vince Foster. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 01:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Hillary Clinton. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, Evan.savage511,
 * You can either choose to be a responsible editor on Wikipedia or you can face an indefinite block from editing. If you keep pushing forward conspiracy theories, you will lose your editing privileges rather quickly. Whether you continue to be able to edit Wikipedia or sent packing is completely up to you right now. I urge you to return to being a productive editor. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)