User talk:Evanand1

Welcome!

 * Blocks are not a punishment, but are done to protect Wikipedia. It is possible to be unblocked if you explain what you did wrong, why you won't do it again, and how you will edit constructively. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Talk page discussion about the issues at Meadow Brook Hall
Hi Evanand1, when your block expires or is lifted I hope you will join the discussion at Talk:Meadow Brook Hall. It would be great if you explained there why you think the existing source is incorrect. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Bonadea, It would be great to know why you had the urge to revert my change without seeing I made the change back in march. It would be nice to know whoever changed that fact, did so without even inquiring? You all jumped into to something that you did not realize what was going on in the first place. 2nd off you tried so hard to get me blocked after I reverted your change that you did to me. Why did you do that in the first place? How about a little communication before jumping in and making assumptions. The revert and undo buttons honestly shouldn't even be allowed!! It takes time for every person to edit on wikipedia. If an edit is not destructive and only a differences of opinion, why even waste someone else's time and throw their work away. Maybe they have done hours of research that you haven't! It's not right in real life and it's not right online either. Don't throw peoples work away. Talk first if you have a difference of opinion!


 * There were several attempts at communication made:, , . Several different people (including me, but I was not the first one) asked you to stop reverting and instead discussing your proposed changes. Wikipedia has a lot of rules and regulations, some of them more strict than others - and the rule about edit warring is stricter than most. The notes you received, which I linked to just now, clearly state that if you revert more than three times within a 24-hour period, you will be blocked (unless you are, e.g., reverting blatant vandalism). When you were reported I can understand that it made feelings flare, but it would have been a much better idea to do what it said in the notification you received, and make your case in the report instead of just removing it. The bottom line is: Please read the info that people take the time to post to your talk page. (As for "not destructive and only a difference of opinion", that's not quite true. Your removal of a source and use of Google Maps violated a couple of different guidelines/policies. But that's not a discussion to have here - again, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes you proposed changes when your block expires or is lifted.) Please also remember to be civil and assume good faith on the part of other editors. It is pretty unacceptable to call good-faith editors "trolls", for instance. --bonadea contributions talk 19:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Yamla, did you not read my statement? It clearly states what I did wrong.
 * Huh. You're still arguing that you actually weren't really wrong, that it is someone else's fault. Drmies (talk) 19:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought I left clear instructions on how to show readiness for unblocking.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Why are you instigating? This is was between me and the Amdin that blocked me and the last person Yamla, I did not ask for your commentary! If you read I did not ask to be unblocked but my time shorten and I stated what I did in the last message to Yamla. I will not conversate further on this matter with you two!!!! I will only talk to Yamla or the original person that blocked me, Thank you! What is wrong with you people on Wikipedia, you are worst than Facebook and YouTube. Please get a life, and stop using the internet to wage war with words and criticize everyone! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanand1 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of Tue, 09 Oct 2018 08:08:23 GMT for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 20:02, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

I've removed your talk page access due to your above post. I hope that you have a change of attitude when the block expires. If you want to be unblocked before then, you may use UTRS as described above. 331dot (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)