User talk:Evanggelist

May 2024
Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you recently removed content from Holy Fire without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nobody ( talk ) 13:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This content is wrong placed in the description of the holy fire. It should be placed in the section of critisism and opposition and not in the description from within the orthodox faith. So it's misplaced. For any further details please contact me. Evanggelist (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Fire, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. ''From further in the article, it's clear that this is how the fire is ignited. There's no reason not to mention it; Wikipedia is not obliged to tell the "in-universe" version of the story.'' —C.Fred (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Additionally, since the material has been removed before, you have made three reverts on the article within 24 hours. Be mindful of the three revert rule, which states editors may be blocked for making more than three reverts within 24 hours. —C.Fred (talk)

Holy fire
The description of faith should be according to what Christian orthodox believe for the holy light. It is not a matter of in-univrse matter of the story. This is a false statement for orthodox faith from a person who just wanted to write something wrong so you should be mindful of wrong opinions. Evanggelist (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia does not present things from the perspective of Orthodox faith—or any faith. It is an encyclopedia with neutral point of view. I don't see a reason to split out a separate section for the Orthodox mythology of the ceremony from the description we have. —C.Fred (talk) 15:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Holy fire
By saying mythology it means that you are not neutral because faith isn't mythology. It's ok you may write what ever you believe about Christianity but be mindful of your illegal actions. Evanggelist (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Quoting Oxford Languages: "mythology: a collection of myths, especially one belonging to a particular religious or cultural tradition. [example:] 'a book discussing Jewish and Christian mythologies'"
 * By using the term "illegal", it is evident that you do not understand Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Your actions, combined with your username, raise the question of whether a conflict of interest taints your perspective on this article. —C.Fred (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)