User talk:Evanh2008/IPs

Hello,

I've added a reply to your question about "in hospital". 96.46.196.36 (talk) 03:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm User 81.138.2.36 and I noticed you mentioned me on the genre warring thing. Sorry if I made some trouble or confusion, I noticed that the genre had been changed on the Led Zeppelin article which had been left there for ages. Sorry if I did anything bad, I tried to help as this recent thing with the user with an IP starting with a 46 was editing all the album articles and I wanted to say I'm not the guy and I wasn't trying to vandalize any pages. I'm sorry if I did anything wrong, I'm just writing to you to explain what I was trying to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.2.36 (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * No, you did everything absolutely right, and I apologize for the confusion. We need more edits like those, so welcome! Evanh2008 (talk&#124;contribs) 22:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking caution though and thank you for making me feel welcome and those other edits I did, sorry about them too, it was as it was changed while the genre was on the article for ages I thought someone edited because of opinion but I was apprehensive as I might get in trouble so again, I'm very sorry for the confusion. I accept what you did though as you were trying to help too but thanks for the apology though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.2.36 (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Green Lantern
The article does not make the statement that is attributed to it. If it had, then the facts do contradict that statement.

The Dark Knight Rises 	2012	$1084439099.00 Iron Man 3 	2013 	$1182023292.00 The Avengers 	2012 	$1511757910.00

With box office figures of $1084439099, $1182023292.00 and $1511757910.00 this would definitely contradict that the general public had decreased interest in Super Hero's films.

86.135.232.115 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, the problem is that the source you gave doesn't say anything about TDKR's success contradicting the idea that lack of public interest in superhero films was a reason behind Green Lantern's failure. Maybe audiences had no interest in superhero films in 2011, but became interested again in 2012/2013. The source doesn't say anything about it, so we can't comment. Taking two events that appear, in your view, to rule out a certain explanation for one of them, is synthesis, and we can't do that here. Evanh2008 (talk&#124;contribs) 21:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You're correct, of course, that the source doesn't say that GL's failure was due to lack of interest, so removing that statement isn't a problem. Evanh2008 (talk&#124;contribs) 21:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Ping back
Left you my rationale for the Tsarnaev addition at User talk:128.211.178.12. Not sure if you have it on your watch list. Reply and edit the article when you can. -- 128.211.178.12 (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

III Kings
Your deletion of your own question in WP:RD/H seems a bit bizarre, but for what it's worth, I was about to post this answer:


 * See Books of Kings. At one time the books 1–2 Samuel and 1–2 Kings were called 1–4 Kings.

Please do not reply at this IP address's talk page. --65.94.50.15 (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)