User talk:Evanreyes/Archive

Don't edit other user's comments
I noticed that you edited someone else's comment for clarity, spelling or grammar. As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks, --Fritz S. (Talk) 13:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Panic! at the Disco article
I moved the Panic! at the Disco back to its correct entry, as we have naming conventions on Wikipedia. Please don't move articles without discussing it first. --HarryCane 13:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It most certainly does not overrule Wikipedia's policies. Plus, every letter of their name is capitalized on most releases and if you take a look at their most recent one ("Lying Is the Most Fun..." single), you will notice that "at" is not capitalized. If you move the article again without discussing it first, I will take this to an admin for page move vandalism. --HarryCane 12:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Your therory's have been tested by many before, and problem many after you, and have failed every time (see Angels and Airwaves talk page for example)Hackajar 15:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Too bad that Wikipedia is based on consensus, rather than your aesthetics. And the band never said that that was their intentional spelling. The MySpace profile, which is probably run by some label intern, is the only source your citing whose header has a different spelling. Unless the band makes an official statement concerning this, Wikipedia's naming conventions apply. --HarryCane 19:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Talk page messages
Please do not remove legitimate messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of legitimate communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. Thanks. --HarryCane 10:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not monitoring anybody's activity. Please see WP:STALK on what is allowed and what is not (especially the part This does not include checking up on an editor to fix errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, nor does it mean reading a user's contribution log; those logs are public for good reason.). But if I return to a talk page I have recently left a comment on and find it blanked, I revert it. That's Wikipedia policy, sorry. --HarryCane 16:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Talk page blanking
Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Fritz S. (Talk) 09:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * It's considered vandalism. Simple as that. If you don't want them on your talk page, archive them, or simply follow the guidelines, then there won't be any warnings. --Fritz S. (Talk) 20:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Wondering
Just wondering, why did you uncapitalize the "the" in this edit? - Bagel7 19:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
I've been extremely busy lately, and I don't have to go online very often. Please allow me to give you a raincheck and answer your questions later. - Bagel7 03:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Dude...
Why are you so anal? Does your entire life depend on me answering some worthless questions on an internet site? Go out and do something. If I don't answer there's a reason: I DON'T WANT TO. But you know what? I will answer your questions if it means you will be able to get on with your life. oh, and for the record, saying something is not "becoming" to another person is the gayest way i have ever heard of insulting someone. happy? - Bagel7 23:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "Just a question though, why would you name some bands correctly (Bowling for Soup, Dead or Alive, Death Cab for Cutie, Kings of Leon, Puddle of Mudd), but clearly list the incorrect name for P!ATD?" beacause of human error, and because i want to. why do you care?
 * "I have something else that goes along with this. I'm interested in helping out with lyricwiki, however I noticed that many of the artists have incorrect capitalization. Is there any system in place to fix that? i.e. Harry and the Potters is not Harry And The Potters" no, theres not, just fix them yourself.
 * really now. because i couldve sworn i put you in your place. thank you, come again - Bagel7 01:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "I don't acting like an imbecile". You don't act like an imbecile? Coulda fooled me. Oh, and the "personal attacks" as you put it were deserved because you wouldnt leave me alone about pointless questions. "If you had used intelligent discourse to get your point across, maybe your desired outcome would have matched up closer to the actual outcome." Can you please talk like a 20-year-old. jeez, i feel like im talking to walt whitman or something. cya later buddy - Bagel7 03:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

"Just like/Like a Woman"
Hi, I just wanted to give you a heads up on the Bob Dylan song issue, that is linked within the Something Corporate article. While the majority of Wikipedia pages capitalize the "like" in this context, it is in fact incorrect, seeing as it is used in its prepositional sense. Like is considered a preposition (and should therefore be not capitalized in song titles per WP:NC) when used like "He eats like a pig." or like in the song "She moves just like a woman". The adjective usage has a slightly different nuance, comparing a subject with a precise other subject ("He is like her", meaning a certain woman, not just any woman as in the song title). --HarryCane 13:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)