User talk:Eve.b.i

Speedy deletion of Lúcio Cardoso
A tag has been placed on Lúcio Cardoso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Chzz  ►  03:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Chzz
Please see my recent comment at User_talk:Chzz. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Clarice Scanned Photos 011.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Clarice Scanned Photos 011.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Translating article to portuguese
Dear Eve, first of all, thank you for your wonderful article about Clarice Lispector. She is one of my favorite authors and as a Brazilian, I thank you for writing about her. I was editing the article in Portuguese and a fellow editor noted how comprehensive the English article is. I wonder if you could share some of the resources you used to write it down. I am planning on either acquiring the books or getting them from my University library in US.

I don't know if you speak Portuguese or not. Based on your comments in the discussion page, I assume you do. If not, I can be of help in providing additional information about Clarice and her books, as I speak both Portuguese in English. Maybe I can also help in expanding this article to become a featured one. Let me know how can I best help you.

I will write her article in Portuguese based on yours. I hope you don't mind.

Warm regards, Editor br (talk) 10:32, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Eve, thank you for your prompt reply. I am moving this discussion to the main article, so other users can benefit from our discussion. Editor br (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Eve, I corrected the page for Laços de Familia. Please check to understand what I did. The explanation is [|here]. It's hard to keep the pace with you! I started to translate and edit a few things in Portuguese, but I am also involved in other edits, so it will take a while to have the pages ready in the -pt domain. Let me know if you need any help. I will probably have the books about Clarice late January. ;-) Cheers, Editor br (talk) 22:01, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Editor br, thank you so much! I'm not fast, I'm just bored over the holidays. Thanks so much for doing that - I also see you've put it into Portuguese! Will try to do a couple more of these so that we can at least have a start. Thanks again Eve.b.i (talk) 09:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Laços de família.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Laços de família.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Lustre.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lustre.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aprendizagem.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Aprendizagem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Clarice Scanned Photos 011.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clarice Scanned Photos 011.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Alguns contos.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alguns contos.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — ξ xplicit  06:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Maçã no escuro.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maçã no escuro.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — ξ xplicit  06:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:LEGIÃO.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LEGIÃO.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — ξ xplicit  06:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Água viva.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Água viva.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — ξ xplicit  06:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Onde estivestes.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Onde estivestes.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. — ξ xplicit  06:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Chechelnik synagogue.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chechelnik synagogue.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Laura Moser for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Moser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laura Moser until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 08:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)