User talk:Eve.bw/sandbox

Comments
Nice start, Eve. These look like they will be very useful additions to the page. Just a couple of notes: I am not sure what you mean by this line: "Considering how realistic these deepfakes can be there have been ways to detect fake context." Do you mean content? Also, the relationship between the first part of the sentence and the last part is not so clear. Are you trying to suggest that despite how realistic the deepfakes are, that there are ways to detect the actual content? Work to make the ideas you are trying to articulate here a bit clearer. I also think you might have a little bit of a problem in maintaining a neutral tone in the following lines: "At the beginning of January 2020, Facebook even outlawed deepfake videos and audios due to the misinformation and disinformation it could potentially cause. It didn’t help when a deepfake video surfaced of Mark Zuckerberg." Work for more factual language here. There are a couple of similar issues in the section on shallowfakes. Finally, be sure to use the Wikipedia format for references and be sure to link them to the text that is synthesized from the sources. Good work! --Jbdolphin (talk) 07:14, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Good job
Good job! Everything is extremely relevant, you picked a good page to add this information to. I like that you want to make it easier on viewers so they don’t have to click through a bunch of links. I think you did a really good job overall. The definitions are really good and including examples is going to be really good to help people understand what it looks like. The only critic is there are a few words that might make the reader think you do not believe “Deepfakes” and “Shallowfakes” are good (not neutral tone). Overall, really nice job. -CasperCasey

Comments Great ideas but some of the content is a bit biased such as "used to manipulate images in any desired way". Photoshopping techniwues can be used to create an image that displays a negative connotation of the object. I would suggest changing "desired" to something that makes it seem less appealing. Also, under the video subtopic, you mention the alteration of "videos, audio, and/or photos"; since it is under the video subheading, I would suggest you only mention videos or audio. At the end of the Shallowfakes subtopic, you mention misinformation in a sentence. I recommend you either edit that part out or include a link to the Misinformation Wikipedia page. Other than that, you have a really great vision for this page! Alenaley (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC)AlenaleyAlenaley (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 1:08 26 April 2021