User talk:EveStardust

Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Catherine of Valois–Courtenay
 * added a link pointing to Emperor of Constantinople
 * Charles, Count of Valois
 * added a link pointing to Emperor of Constantinople

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Your recent unexplained change to John II of France is chronologically incorrect.

John was not "John II" at his marriage to Bonne of Luxembourg in 1332 or his second marriage on 19 February 1350, since he did not become king until 22 August 1350. This type of editing is disruptive. Continued editing of this type will result in the notification of an Admin. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries, please
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric talk 00:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Making controversial edits with no discussion
Hello EveStardust. Your edits have encountered some objections and several of them have been reverted by others. That is your cue to explain your thinking on talk pages. So far you have never posted to a talk page, or responded to any complaints. If this continues you are risking a block. Wikipedia depends on finding agreement with others through discussion. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philippa of Hainault. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   Eric talk 18:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Hello, can you explain what you mean by disruptive editing. Please elaborate with example so i can understand better. EveStardust (talk) 20:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It is a general term used in some template messages. I think if you read the edit summaries of the editors who revert your changes, you should be able to understand the reason for the messages you are receiving. Note: It is easier for all if you keep discussions on one page, i.e. if you get a message here such as the one I left, it's best to reply here. Eric talk 21:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)