User talk:Evelyn Harthbrooke/Archive 1

Originals (Cozi Zuehlsdorff EP)
The Originals (Cozi Zuehlsdorff EP) article's only reference is to a store that is selling the music, which is not an independent source. Do not remove the tag unless you have added citations to significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 21:58, 21 May 2015 (UTC) PAGE ]]) 16:29, 26 May 2015 (UTC) PAGE ]]) 18:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 21:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I have gone ahead and fixed the references. Fixed them last week or so. Kamran Mackey (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The only source in the article is to the person's official website, which is not independent of the subject of the article. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK
 * That's not Cozi's official website. It's a site dedicated to her and is run by separate people, so it is independent. Kamran Mackey (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If it's a fan site, and therefore neither a reputable organization with editorial oversight nor an official website, then it is not considered a reliable source. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK
 * Look, the source is good enough. I couldn't find any other sources anyway. And you do realize that you can't have a source if it's NOT related to the subject of the article? The source has to be about the subject of the article, or it's not a source. I've been on Wikipedia long enough to know this. In fact I've been on Wikipedia for over 4 years, so I think I know what I'm doing. Kamran Mackey (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If there isn't significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article, then the subject is probably not notable enough for an article. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK
 * Are you kidding me right now? The dang article is a stub. And do you really need a reputable source for a darn release date? This is ridiculous. Kamran Mackey (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Originals (Cozi Zuehlsdorff EP) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Originals (Cozi Zuehlsdorff EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Originals (Cozi Zuehlsdorff EP) & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 14:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 14:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Again? Please stop with this. I'm sorry, but as a user of Wikipedia for over 3 years, you're starting to push my buttons. I'm still working on the article, so please stop with this! Kamran Mackey (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you're still working on the article then don't move it into mainspace. I'll also add that WP:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. If you've been a user here for 3 years, surely you're familiar with both WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

Oh, hi.
Can you remember me? yea, it's me, Dyn. I was reading article Plug.dj and reviewing history of it, I found your username. I didn't know you're also one of contributors of Wikimedia Projects, currently I'm not so active on any projects now (formerly I was on WP and wmflabs) , but still finding projects suitable to me. Hope that see you again in here! :D --Dynamicwork (complain) 17:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: Disney XD
The specific statement is already cited by a secondary source in the body text, which are preferred over primary sources.

That edit summary also seemed a bit WP:OWN-ish, by the way. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Google Chrome Screenshot.png


A tag has been placed on File:Google Chrome Screenshot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This image cannot be used under fair use as the website illustrated is not public domain. Canadian government websites are Crown Copyright. Ahunt (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have re-uploaded the image with a U.S website, which is the exact same website as used in the previous Google Chrome screenshot. Kamran Mackey (talk) 19:08, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That is great, that fixed the issue. I have tagged the image file to have the old version removed. - Ahunt (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, awesome. Glad that fixed the issue. :) Kamran Mackey (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No big deal, copyrights are hard to understand. It has taken me a long time here to learn the little I know about them! US govt websites and documents are always public domain and so good for screenshots of browsers, PDF readers, etc. - Ahunt (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Name/Sig change
Hi, Please don't change peoples names/signatures like you did here,

I want to Assume Good Faith but I really have no idea how you could do it unintentionally in the first place but either way I'd ask you don't repeat those actions as you could be blocked,

Thanks & Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 23:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't change his signature. It was the fault of the source editor. I wouldn't edit someone else's signature, ever. Kamran Mackey (talk) 23:51, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on WP:PERM/F. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''1 -- Please ask nicely and point out that you did the tasks before. You may ask other sysop for opinion or assistance.'' Thank you. NgYShung huh? 15:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Stylization
MOS:TM discourages and restricts this practice. In fact, in writing, Corus only uses that form in its logo. All of its official materials/press releases properly capitalize it. ViperSnake151  Talk  18:25, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Learning Python 5th Ed cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Learning Python 5th Ed cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cozi Zuehlsdorff
Template:Cozi Zuehlsdorff has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Disney Channel 2014.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Disney Channel 2014.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cozi Zuehlsdorff - Originals cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cozi Zuehlsdorff - Originals cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Re:
What potentially controversial edits have I made lately that don't have an edit summary? ViperSnake151  Talk  03:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Never said any of your edits were "potentially controversial". Just saying that it would be nice (and it's recommended to do so via Wikipedia's own guidelines) if you supplied the majority (or all) of your edits with an edit summary if possible. Kamran Mackey (talk) 03:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Award for you!

 * Thank you so much for the award and compliments! :) Kamran Mackey (talk) 22:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Wording in edit summaries
Hi Just a small tip: Try to remain focused on the content and information presented in sources, using good arguments and using Wikipedia's guidelines in explaining your edits. Edit summaries such as "No", "Do not turn this into an edit war", and "No. That is not how wikilinks work" can come across as passive-aggressive (or directly aggressive) to some users. Remember, we all want to benefit the project, we just have different views on how to do so. But friendliness and proper argumentation will always be best. :) Also, while I am writing here, just another thought: Maaaaybe take an extra few moments to consider your edits before making them? I've noticed several times that you have reverted yourself (here and here). There's nothing wrong with realizing a mistake was made, but it's best to think carefully about an edit before making it :) Have a nice day! LocalNet (talk) 20:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Summary
My deepest apology for using Hindi language in my edit summaries. I thought we could use any language. From now on I will try to use English language. Thank you for pointing out my wrong. RikkiSharma (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:IPhone App Store.png
Thanks for uploading File:IPhone App Store.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 20:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

News (software)
Hello, my aggressive friend. :)

Sad as it might be to hear it, much of what you wrote was wrong.

Care to let me tell you what and why?

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 04:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Essential Phone
See the talkpage for some references if you wish to expand the article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney Channel 2014.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Disney Channel 2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

File:VS Code (Insiders).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VS Code (Insiders).png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:7185:B855:ACA:9F40 (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Stickies.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

financial update
Thank you for adding the remaining on Apple financial 2018 with the citation.BBMatBlood (talk) 10:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:GrisCoverImage.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (IPod Touch (7th generation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating IPod Touch (7th generation).

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Images
Each and every use of a WP:FAIRUSE image needs to be explicitly justified. That wasn't done for the image you readded to iOS. --Yamla (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VS Code (Insiders).png
Thanks for uploading File:VS Code (Insiders).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on IOS version history
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://support.apple.com/en-ph/HT208067, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Your addition to iOS version history has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:17, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: ~Swarm~ {sting} 01:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Non-breaking spaces
I reverted a couple of mass-change edits you made to some numbers, because you removed non-breaking spaces between numbers and their denominations (e.g. "12 billion"). For some guidance on the subject, see MOS:NBSP or, more broadly, MOS:NUM. Cheers! &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 13:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Calgary
Hello! I appreciate your edits to Calgary. Thanks. Old Hoar&#39;s Frost (talk) 03:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

iPhone 12 Pro RAM type
"'iPhones have been using LPDDR4X memory since the X. I don't think it needs a citation.'" (link)

You removed the whole thing anyways, but I didn't get this DDR4 reasoning. Is there no 5G either, just because 4G's been around since iPhone 5? --Diblidabliduu (talk) 12:16, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

File:VS Code (Insiders).png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VS Code (Insiders).png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aasim (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VS Code (Insiders).png
Thanks for uploading File:VS Code (Insiders).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Image upload issues
Hi, I am sorry for bothering you but I am having issues uploading a new version of the File:VS Code (Insiders).png image for the Visual Studio Code and I messed up the file history section. Could you assist me with uploading the image file?
 * The file has just been updated by me to the latest current Code - Insiders build. You don't have to worry about anything anymore. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 11:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Apologies for not signing on the earlier message. The k nine 2 (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VS Code (Insiders).png
Thanks for uploading File:VS Code (Insiders).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

== Please feel free to respond on the RfC on whether to say in the UPE template that the payer isn't necessarily the subject of the article ==

The idea is add the words, "The payer for the editing is not necessarily the subject of the article." to what is already there in the template.

Before:

After:

The idea came about from the sockpuppet investigation discussed at Sockpuppet_investigations/VentureKit/Archive in which over 87 articles got the undisclosed paid editing template, and I'm writing to you because you removed that template from the article on Disney CEO Bob Chapek on 4 February 2021‎ with the edit summary, "Result was Inconclusive; so remove template", and so would have some familiarity with the events.

I wrote a somewhat lengthy proposal statement with more details which is available at the talk page on the template, but can just aim to keep this short as people didn't respond to that.

My view is that this is just one additional sentence and provides helpful information to readers about what the situation is (based on how editors are using that template, say for example in sockpuppet investigations).

Praxidicae has said that it's silly and unnecessary, and may elaborate further on that.

As of this writing one other person has responded on the issue, and says Oppose.

Please feel free to offer any thoughts on it at the RfC.

Also, if you aren't inclined to respond there, just feel free to offer any thoughts at all here on this talk page.

Jjjjjjjjjj (talk) 21:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:VS Code (Insiders).png
Thanks for uploading File:VS Code (Insiders).png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spotify iOS Browse.png
Thanks for uploading File:Spotify iOS Browse.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Fixed your talk page archiving
Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for 3ds Max.png
Thanks for uploading File:Logo for 3ds Max.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Manual of Style discussion
Left is bad as per two mos pages even the one your linking....best not to say otherwise MOS:IMAGELOC ="Most images should be on the right side of the page, which is the default placement. A consistent left margin creates a stable anchor for tracking through lines of text making it more readable / accessible". MOS:ACCIM ="Avoid placing images on the left hand side as a consistent left margin makes reading easier." This is accessibility basics HARVARD COLLEGE Moxy - 04:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Moxy: yeah, i know that, however in the case of a map that is displayed directly above a table, wouldn't left aligning it be more consistent with the rest of the article? (e.g. in the case of section headings, tables that span the full width of the page, etc)
 * the map is one of the very few images in the kinds of articles i'm referencing (the visa requirement articles). - Evelyn Marie (leave a message · contributions) 04:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

List of Intel Core articles
Hello Evelyn Marie,

I see that you have removed the pricing, part numbers, and sSpec info from the List of Core i7 and i9 articles, following a "too much detail" tagging by User:Freedom4U. Well, could you have a look at the thread I've created at Talk:List of Intel Core processors and participate if you have anything to say? The changes you have made caught my eye a bit there, as a number of my planned changes in the post-merge List of Intel Core article go over removing excessive detail and duplicate information, to improve readability and accessibility of the tables, and reduce their data footprints so the PEIS limit issue is significantly mitigated.

Sidenote: as it says in the It has been suggested that this article be merged notice at the top of Intel Core articles, the Core 2, i3, i5, i7, i9 articles are actually currently in the process of being merged into the List of Intel Core processors article, per the linked discussion, and so when everything's done and cleaned up on that article, the i3 i5 i7 list articles vice versa will be turned into redirects, so please keep that in mind. — AP 499D25  (talk)  05:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @AP 499D25 I have gone ahead and replied. :) - Evelyn Marie (leave a message · contributions) 05:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

iPhone 6s
Thanks for your comment on the iPhone Ns renames. Might I suggest you make it a comment of its own instead of just a reply to another comment?

Also, I'm curious why you thought that the mention of the stylization as iPhone 6🅂 wasn't necessary. While I personally thought it was a bit silly, Apple was very consistent about using it in ads, on the box, etc. It's true that they rarely used it in plain text, but that was probably because the 🅂 and 🄲 (for the 5🄲) can't be typed directly. It seems it should be mentioned in the interest of accuracy and completeness. I don't feel super strongly about this (it's clearly visible in the infobox on the various pages), but I think it should be there.

RoyLeban (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

It is indeed frustrating
I understand your sentiments on the subject of the version history articles. I have watched a few extremely detailed articles of technical information on components get put to the axe... and in my professional capacity as an engineer... I fuckin' hate it!!! But as Wikipedians, it is all we can do to try to be reasonable and find common ground with people. I appreciate what you have brought to these discussions, although boy howdy do they get heated. And props for all of that damn work rewriting the Firefox article into prose -- that was a really wild amount of effort. jp×g 08:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Shortdesc
Just saw your edit to Manic Dream Pixie and just wanted to let you know that, unless there's something I've misunderstood, I'm assuming you're just not aware that Template:Infobox album adds a short description automatically. It shouldn't matter because I'm pretty sure the one you added is verbatim what the auto-generated one would be. And if I'm off-base and that's not what was confusing you then excuse me! QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 01:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I did not know that! But yes, I did pretty much use the same wording, i just used the full meaning of "extended play" instead of "EP", so that way its easier for readers to look up what "extended play" means if they aren't familiar with it. :) - Evelyn Marie (leave a message · contributions) 01:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Request for assistance
Help ! I have made an edit request a couple of days ago however, despite prolonged negotiations, I am being considered for another range block as according to administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Plus, I have no intention to evade any blocks.197.238.55.142 (talk) 03:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

New message from AP 499D25
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of AMD Ryzen processors § Inclusion of prices in the tables. — AP 499D25  (talk)  13:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:IMessage Compose.png
Thank you for uploading File:IMessage Compose.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)