User talk:Even house

Notability of Highbrone
A tag has been placed on Highbrone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Please don't be disruptive by trying to delay the deletion of an article which clearly does not meet this site's requirements for inclusion. Please review WP:WEB before you create another article of this type.  Thank you.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

OK, once more: Read WP:WEB. Your project does not meet the minimum standards of notability required for inclusion. While you're at it, please take a look at WP:CIVIL and What Wikipedia is not. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Doesn't matter. It doesn't meet the standards.  If you can provide reliable third-party sources as to why this game clan is notable, it might stand a chance.  Otherwise, it's likely to be deleted within the next few minutes.  Once more:  Please read the rules.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I told you before, on your talk page.. it was an accidental click. I was mean't to click PREVIEW, it must be that im new to all this? Give me a chance?

What do you think that I'm trying to do? Look, your first edits right out of the box have been to an article about a completely non-notable game clan. I am trying to steer you straight, yet you insist on going on the defensive. I am asking you one last time to please read the guidelines. Otherwise, you run a very real risk of having your account shut down. OK? Like I said, I am trying to help. Drop the defensive posture, read the rules and get a better understanding of this site. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

What am I doing wrong? Tell me.

Nomination for merger of Template:For timeline
Template:For timeline has been nominated for merging with Template:For outline. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Moxy - 14:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)