User talk:EverSince/Archive 2

New attempt to remove OccupyMARINES
Please forgive this unsolicited contact, but I note that a couple of weeks ago, you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia regarding the proposed deletion of their entry on OccupyMARINES. Of 26 respondents, 24 voted to Keep; only 2 voted Delete. The result was to Keep the article.

However, it has now been nominated again for deletion, and I thought you might be interested. Here's the URL for the new discussion page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Occupy_Marines_%282nd_nomination%29

JohnValeron (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Recovery model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links to Stress and Case management


 * Mentalism (discrimination) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link to Mental

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg
Hello, !

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Good idea
That's the best edit that's been made to Occupy Marines in a long time. I think it reads a lot better now. Good work. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 05:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Thought I'd give it a go in that direction what with all the circling, thanks for the feedback and your peacemaking there... Every (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Came here to add my thanks as well, good effort on the rewrite. Wee Curry Monster talk 16:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Cheers, I kinda realised your point...I hope the others keep editing it if they're ok with it. Every (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Mental disorder
Just dropping by to complement you on the good job you're doing there. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi thanks it seemed like it needed some more work in some areas, am also wondering whether some of the longer subsections could do with being boiled down a bit... Btw I do tend to agree re the image issue, assuming an ideal one can't be found or isn't possible, also thought it best to wait for any other comments. Eversync (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hey thanks for stopping by, that's really good to know, particularly with your involvement in it. I think that might be a better name than recovery approach btw, though it seems tricky when it can be a very personal thing. Just noticed someone's made a Recovery Coaching too regarding addictions. Thanks again. Eversync (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Over and Out
Eversync (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

WB
benzband ( talk ) 10:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mark David Chapman in 1975.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Mark David Chapman in 1975.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Encourage
Template:Encourage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 06:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)