User talk:EverettTheUrban

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ward (web serial) (April 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ward (web serial) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ward (web serial), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ward_(web_serial) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ward_(web_serial) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 21:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ward (web serial) (April 19)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ward_(web_serial) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bilorv was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As you say, web serials don't typically get mainstream news coverage. Wikipedia does not have articles on everything that exists, only things which meet our strict notability criteria. The content you have written can be used on other sites instead, such as Wikia, which hosts fan wikis without any standard of notability.

— Bilorv (he/him) (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Xi Jinping Poohbear comparison meme.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xi Jinping Poohbear comparison meme.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Non-free Content
I have reverted your edit here. Non-free content may only be used when all of the non-free content criteria are met. Please see WP:NFCC. A separate rationale must be provided for each use of the image. -- Whpq (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * And I reverted your edit, there's legitimate grounds for the image to be there. Don't touch it againEverettTheUrban (talk) 11:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Read the POLICY linked above. You MUST provide a rationale for each use.  You have not provided any rationale for its use in the Pooh article. -- Whpq (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

 Hello, EverettTheUrban, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

EverettTheUrban, good luck, and have fun. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 11:56, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lord Buckethead with other candidates.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Lord Buckethead with other candidates.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:43, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lord Buckethead with other candidates.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Lord Buckethead with other candidates.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:21, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Buckethead in a chair.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Buckethead in a chair.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Hi, EverettTheUrban, I've re-deleted the Lord Buckethead pictures you uploaded. According to the source website, they have not been explicitly released into the public domain by the copyright holder (which in this case would be the photographer); published works are automatically protected by copyright, so the images would have to be *explicitly* released into the public domain to qualify as a PD upload. Since they aren't public domain, your copyright rationale was incorrect, and they also haven't been explicitly released under terms compatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-SA license, so Wikipedia cannot host them as free images at all. Please don't attempt to upload the images again; copyright is a confusing mess, and it's perfectly okay to make occasional mistakes, but insisting on mistakes like this is serious, and will lead to a block from editing. Thanks, Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 14:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Buckethead in a chair.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Buckethead in a chair.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:56, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Lord Buckethead with other candidates.jpeg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lord Buckethead with other candidates.jpeg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:59, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Edit-warring to add non-free images to articles despite the lack of a rationale for use in the article not very collaborative. I won't bother reverting again, but don't be surprised if some other editor removes those images.'' Whpq (talk) 18:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I gave a rationale for including the images, hence why they are being continuously readded. They are relevant to the articles.EverettTheUrban (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * A separate non-free usage rationale must be provided on the image description page for each article it is to be used in. You have not provided such rationales. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It's only the one article. EverettTheUrban (talk) 20:31, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for having violated the 3 revert rule. If so many different editors disagree with you, the response should not be to edit war with them. El_C 18:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * They didn't offer a legitimate reason for reverting my edits, nor did they elaborate on my talk page or the article's.EverettTheUrban (talk) 18:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * That, in itself, is not an exemption from the rule. El_C 18:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I'm misinterpreting the rule, then - but as far as I saw at the time it was no different from just blanking sections of text. A block wasn't necessary, if someone had a problem they were welcome to pull their finger out and speak with me on my talk page or in the article as I offered. EverettTheUrban (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * As I said in the edit summary, I was worried about the uploading of this image and possible WP:AXE. This seems to have been added because direct links to ED will not save because it is on the spam blacklist. Why the fascination with Yamla?-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 19:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah ha ha, I hadn't looked at the image. For the record, had I done so, I'd probably have excused myself out of reviewing the unblock request. Well, now I'm curious why the fixation on me, too. I'm not aware of any previous interactions with this user. --Yamla (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I would've included the standard wikipedia article on ED but if you check for yourself it's filled with NSFW content. The Yamla article on the other hand was relatively clean, but demonstrated the satire/antipathy directed towards the project so it came up useful. EverettTheUrban (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said, this is basically WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY. The problem is the lack of secondary sourcing. As the policy says, "Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so."-- ♦Ian Ma c M♦  (talk to me) 19:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Feel free to ignore this unsolicited advice. Your block is (currently) only for 24 hours. There are no article updates so important that they cannot wait a day to be done.   Withdraw your unblock request and use that time to think about what you did wrong, and how you will handle a similar situation in the future.  -- Whpq (talk) 19:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hmm. I missed all the nonsense with your other socks at, which led to this and explains your Yamla fetish. I'm presuming you're a large part of the nonsense coming from this range, given your unblock request there.  Kuru   (talk)  00:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked as you aren't eligible for unblock consideration here, and as you have been explicitly trying to harm Wikipedia by violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Another admin will be along shortly to review this request. --Yamla (talk) 23:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)