User talk:EverlastingGaze

Welcome
Hello, EverlastingGaze, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  00:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

October 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing multiple accounts, as you did at White Terror (Russia). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for acknowledging that you and the IP are the same person. However, right after registering your account, you continued an ongoing battle at White Terror (Russia), the article talk page, and various noticeboards without disclosing who you were.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * How does that qualify as "abusing multiple accounts"? Editing with the IP address stopped after the creation of the account. Can you explain why it was necessary for me to identify that the IP address belonged to me when you already had figured out that fact? Why hasn't cwmacdougall been restricted for edit-warring? EverlastingGaze (talk) 01:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

User ‎75.51.171.155 and NPOV
Please do not continue the discussion at WP:ANI. It has been moved to Neutral point of view/Noticeboard, so please comment over there. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at White Terror (Russia). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * EverlastingGaze was warned here.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:50, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "White Terror". Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 23:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Warning

 * Only warning. Any more disruptive editing at White Terror (Russia) will be met with a long block.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at White Terror (Russia). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

On November 16, EG restored their version. After I reverted and warned them, they left the article alone for about a day and engaged in a discussion on the talk page. The discussion didn't result in a consensus; it was barely amicable. Unhappy that things do not go "their" way, EG then reinserted material in the article. They did not reinsert all of the material they had done on the 16th, but I did check the edits to confirm that they had at least reinserted some of that material. Based on their past behavior and my most recent warning, I imposed an indefinite block.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

No comment, as yet, on the merits - but explain it for me. What went wrong last time? How do you plan to edit differently this time around? I am familiar with and can find the relevant policies, so you don't need to give me a standard "I will follow these policies..." answer. Just lay it out for me - how will you edit differently if unblocked, particularly if a similar situation arises? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


 * EverlastingGaze, if you are willing to avoid edit-warring completely (not just violating 3RR violations, but any edit-warring) I will unblock your account. This means that you will not revert when your contributions are contested and you will discuss your edits in a collegial and civil fashion on the relevant article talk page and pursue dispute resolution. Any violation of these terms would result in your account being reblocked. Do you agree to these terms?--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ... and as per WP:GAB, you need to explain to us how things will be different in the future, if you become unblocked. What will you do differently - what processes will you use - what personal changes will you have made before the unblocking? (✉→BWilkins ←✎) 11:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * He's addressed all of that. — Lfdder (talk) 23:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)