User talk:EvilGeniusD

Hello, EvilGeniusD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Jacob Shaw have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Invitrovanitas (talk) 11:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Jacob Shaw. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Invitrovanitas (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Jacob Shaw. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Invitrovanitas (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jacob Shaw. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced potentially controversial statements about a living person. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Block for "Vandalism"
Hello JamesBWatson, i have not nor would i ever vandalized the Wiki-Article of Jacob Shaw. I was merely of the opinion that ANY article should have a valid, well rounded consideration form all possible angels, and since i found the article to be very one-sided i decided to do a little research on Jacob Shaw and i came up with some interesting criticism that is commonly stated. Therefore i decided to work this criticism into the article. The reason why i submitted the edit repeatedly was that i found that said Mr. Shaw was not very happy with public criticism being shown on "his" page and thereby deleted the edit. I was always under the impression that wikipedia is not a forum for self-promotion but a encyclopedia which goal it is to provide a well rounded picture of facts. I will gladly provide the references for my reported criticism. Sincerely, EvilGeniusD