User talk:EvilLair/Archive 1

I am EvilLair. To view my user page, click here.

If you email me via Special:EmailUser, please message me with   or  .

My current signature is  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 22:26, 20 October 2014 (UTC).



A cup of tea for you!

 * Thanks, Njoy deep. -- Evil Lair  ( talk to me! ) 22:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome
thanks for being my first contact in Wikipedia :) Friday.science (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome and the links. Artistmaj (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's a message I sent automatically with Twinkle. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 17:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Swarth has been accepted
 Harry Swarth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:EvilLair help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Adding image to your new article
Greetings, since the subject is deceased, you can upload one photo of this person under WP:Fair use. Please see Uploading images for details. If you get confused in the process, visit WP:Teahouse for advice from volunteer mentors. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I've added the image. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 02:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Expanding Harry Swarth
Nice work, but it needed an explicit WP:Lede (don't start with birth, start with why he's famous; it's not for being born in Chicago).

If you want to expand it, I suggest searching variants of his name and "birds" or "ornithology" on GoogleBooks. See what facts about him are established in serious academic works. If you find a fun fact, just copy the GoogleBooks URL (while inside the book) and paste it into http://reftags.appspot.com to instantly turn it into a full Wikipedia footnote.

Consider too making a "Works" section listing out the books he's written (just title and date). Use WP:Columns if it starts displaying too long, so folks don't need to scroll so much.


 * I'm still doing some research. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 05:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Great work, and hopefully you've learned a few tricks so far. Hope you'll stick around to keep building Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Perfect job uploading the pic under Fair Use; so many new editors think "I found it" means they can label it "Own Work, Released Under Public Domain" and the image gets deleted months later when someone catches that mis-label. Properly doing "Deceased - Fair Use" and citing the immediate source should mean you're bulletproof. MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I've labeled a few images with proper copyright information before, like the book covers for two Dr. Seuss books, so I know how to label copyrighted images. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 05:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I've done some of my work looking at Amazon.com. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 06:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!!!
Cheers! &#34;We could read for-EVER&#59; reading round the wiki!&#34; (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 18:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Saddam_jaffery
Hi EvilLair -

Can I ask why on earth you reviewed Saddam_jaffery and marked it as okay? It was an unsourced autobiography of a child actor... Kevin Gorman (talk) 02:32, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Cranberry Products. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Hamdy Gamal, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Cranberry Products (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your experience with Wikipedia so far
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 19:28, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! , and

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Miyagawa (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Your experience with Wikipedia so far
Hello EvilLair,

I am conducting research about newcomers to Wikipedia and I was hoping to ask you some questions. I’ve noticed you’ve had some good activity recently. Is there any chance you have time in the next month to speak with me? If you are interested or have any questions, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu or leave a message on my talk page.

I hope to be in touch soon,

Gabrielm199 (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I have the time. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 22:21, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your interest! A few quick questions to help us coordinate: What time zone are you in? I am on the east coast of the United States (UTC -5) What time of day (your time) works best for you? What day(s) of the week work best? Next week Monday-Thursday is flexible for me. For communication, do you prefer skype, google, phone, email? Thanks. Gabrielm199 (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)


 * 1. Eastern US Time Zone, 2. 3-7 PM, 3. Email, my secondary one is arrodrig12@yahoo.com. --  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 14:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge,  led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
 * took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
 * worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
 * developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
 * And last but not least, worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. , and

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Happy Easter!



 * Thanks! -  Ev il La ir ( ✉  |  c ) 15:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 May newsletter
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus. Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
 * was one of several users who worked on improving Ulysses S. Grant. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article.
 * took Dragonfly to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took Damselfly there as well for a 2x bonus.
 * worked up Alexander Hamilton to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a level 4 vital article.

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! , and  16:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Ltblood/sandbox
I've got a question what is a the user sandbox for? --Ltblood (talk) 21:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Vandal
How or rather Where [both How and Where work (I think)] did you find the User Page Vandalism Counter? And one more thing how do you change the color of your username?

--Ltblood (talk) 01:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)LtBlood

Gamer's Guide to ...
Hi there assuming for a moment that a talk page comment is a reliable source, how does 0.541 million get rounded down to 0.5, if we care about two significant digits? At worst, that would be 0.54. ? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

The 7D scheduling
I made some tweaks to The 7D episode guide part. Rock of Sages is confirmed to be episode 1-24, and at least it's completed according to copyright.gov. They haven't aired it yet, so whether it will be part of season 2 or the finale of season 1 is uncertain. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 03:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:


 * , who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy.  A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
 * , second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
 * , first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany.  Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
 * , second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
 * , from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
 * , from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
 * , from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
 * , also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

, and  11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pickle and Peanut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wayback Machine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)