User talk:Evil Eccentric

Hey, Chris. Some guy named User:Georgia guy is harrassing me. Isn't that funny.TheKid 01:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Take a look at this
Hey! You made a wrong revert on this article, here. Be careful! --Zingazin 16:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SouthsideMoby1.jpg
Thanks for uploading. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg
Thanks for uploading. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Miranda IM screenshot
I forgot, sorry. I checked the link on the wallpaper but seems like the site no longer host that picture anymore. -- G.S.K.Lee 04:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Rock music invitation
Hello WikiProject Alternative music member. WikiProject Alternative music, in my eyes, has proved to be successful "improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock", and improving their quality as well. One specific example I have witnessed is The Smashing Pumpkins article. The page has gone from a mediocre work, to GA status, to FA nomination. Only appropriate, as the Pumpkins are undeniably one of the most influential alternative rock bands on the 1990's and beyond. This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently ressurected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and not only be a member of alternative Wikipedians, but the rockin' ones as well. Rock on. -- Reaper  X  03:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music and sources
As part of the Alternative music WikiProject, we're gathering a list of sources on this page. Could you take a look and perhaps add any written references you have access to? Thanks! CloudNine 10:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternative music WikiProject newsletter
Delivered by CloudNine 14:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LiveX10.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LiveX10.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg
Hello, Evil Eccentric. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg) was found at the following location: User talk:Evil Eccentric. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or    media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:AirPort_Admin_Utility_Icon.png
I have tagged Image:AirPort_Admin_Utility_Icon.png as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 10:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music June 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Alternative music July 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 21:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Alternative music August 2007 Newsletter
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 00:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC).

Little context in Last Night (Moby album)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Last Night (Moby album), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Last Night (Moby album) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Last Night (Moby album), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 20:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Macosx server leopard.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Macosx server leopard.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Also, it's out of date too, maybe we should also use this time to get an actual screenshot of the final version while we're at it. ViperSnake151 12:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Macosx server leopard.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Macosx server leopard.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Remixes (Silversun Pickups EP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page you created, you may want to consult WP:Your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 03:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MylonLeFevre.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MylonLeFevre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SouthSideMoby1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SouthSideMoby1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SouthsideMoby2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SouthsideMoby2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:IWoz.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:IWoz.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Save-Me-Oprah (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LiveX11.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LiveX11.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Art Is Resistance Question
Hi. I was just wondering if you had a link documenting "This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Trent Reznor" for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Art_Is_Resistance.svg

I made a work based off of it and have now been asked to remove it from my site as they believe it to be copyrighted. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Akohler Talk @ 18:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I responded on your talk page, in case you're watching here! --Evil Eccentric (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:LakesideGAHS.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LakesideGAHS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:ChambleeHigh.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ChambleeHigh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Live X and non-free covers
I've removed the album covers from this article for failing WP:NFC. We do not permit the use of non-free covers on discography type articles. Please do not restore these. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm curious about this Hammersoft, and this seems like a place to discuss it because Evil Eccentric uploaded the pictures. What makes other album covers acceptable, but these not?  Is it because the others are seen on places like Amazon or Allmusic?  The Live X albums were only sold by the station, so (online) stores don't have the images.  Is that the distinguishing factor?  I feel that this type of info/pictures greatly increases the value and usefulness of Wikipedia, so not having these album covers never makes sense to me, especially since thousands of other album covers are all over the site.  What is the reasons that these fail NFC?  Thanks.  --Mtjaws (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There's no consideration at all for what Amazon, Allmusic, or any other site hosts. It's irrelevant. The core issue is WP:NFCC, in this case item #8. Also covered in the supporting guideline at NFC. In discographies, or articles that function as discographies (as this one does), we do not permit the use of album covers. We do permit them on specific album articles. Albums that pass WP:NALBUMS have their own articles, and are significant enough to allow a non-free image of the cover. In this case, we have a discography with a reproduction of the tracks of each release, and not much else. They're just not significant enough to warrant the use of a non-free image. Hope that clarifies the issue. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Hammersoft. I understand your concern. However, the Live X series seems perfectly notable to me. When I first created the article, I felt there wasn't enough material to justify each album having its own article. Therefore, I thought a single article would be more appropriate. As Mtjaws said, this album art is very notable. Covers have been designed by David Bowie, Moby, Beck, Dave Matthews, Thom Yorke and Michael Stipe, among others. As these covers have been designed by some of the biggest names in alternative rock, I don't think they violate WP:NFCC #8, since their "presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." --Evil Eccentric (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If you believe my removal is in error, you can take it up at WT:NFC. I can assure you, it is not. No other article on Wikipedia is permitted to have covers like this, and I fail to see a reason to permit this article to have them. But, feel free to get second opinions at WT:NFC. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree that these albums aren't each worthy of having their own page, but this "combined" page is a better way to share the info about these albums. So I see it as less a true discography page, like many other bands have, and more like a page for a series of compilations where the cover art is both unique and relevant to the article.  I realize the page is lacking in sourced info and discussion, but it's a shame that good content (the album covers) is removed because of technicalities, especially when it clearly enhances the article.  --Mtjaws (talk) 19:45, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Mtjaws. Thanks for your input. I completely agree with you. Per Hammersoft's suggestion, I moved the discussion here. --Evil Eccentric (talk) 19:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for starting it there. I added my comment there too.  I saw on that page that a similar situation occurred for a Much Music cd series page (Big Shiny Tunes), so obviously they are "cracking down" on compilation series articles that appear to be discographies.  Hopefully the difference will be seen, and the pictures remain.  Do you have all the editions?  I just bought Vol 2 on ebay, and now only need Vol 1 to complete my collection.  I sure wish the new 99X would release more editions too.  The music is always so great.  Thanks again for discussing this.  --Mtjaws (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, this "cracking down" isn't something new. We've been doing it for years. Discography type articles haven't hosted album covers for years upon years. It's nothing new. I came upon the article in question because it appeared on this report. You will note that not a single article with "discography" in the title is on the list, save one which does not have album covers on it. Yet, we have about 2000 discography articles on Wikipedia. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I know it's not new, and there are WP rules for everything, especially pictures. I simply noticed that you recently cleaned up the Big Shiny article in similar fashion.  I also still don't think the Live X page is a true discography, but I know others will disagree and enforce the guidelines.  I'm sure there's no way around it, so I guess the page will have to do without the helpful and relevant pictures until new sources are discovered.  Research we will.  --Mtjaws (talk) 20:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, and it's not recent for me either :) I've been doing this for a long time too . That one was heavily debated, and a claim made it wasn't a discography either. Didn't work. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

@Mtjaws Yeah, I've got all 12! Too bad you still need Live X 1; that one cost me $60 on eBay! I wish the new 99X would release them too. I guess since Cumulus Radio did that weird HD radio nonsense, they are trying to give 99X as little funding as possible. Your user page says you live in Florida; do you still listen? Also, which one's your favorite? I like Live X 6. I had never heard of any of those songs, but I love every one of them! --Evil Eccentric (talk) 18:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't listen anymore, but do follow 99x online, with hopes new cds will appear. I lived in Atlanta for half of the 90s, so enjoyed everything about the station and its music.  Live X 4 was my first one, so I seem to still like it best, but recent ones are still good, especially 6.  I haven't listened to 11-12 much though, so those are probably my least fave because less familiar to me.  I had to buy 2&3 on ebay, and always look for 1.  I should've bought those first three when volume 4 came out, but I didn't realize that then.  Hopefully more new will come out someday though, despite station changes.  I also enjoy the funny Morning X cds by Barnes, Leslie, Jimmy too.  99x had some great releases over the years, and I'm lucky to have most of them.  I think I'll start listening to them all again too!  Enjoy.  --Mtjaws (talk) 06:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SouthsideMoby2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:SouthsideMoby2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ColorTheory DepecheMode.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ColorTheory DepecheMode.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)