User talk:Evilgohan2/Archive 4

New Signature
Hey, I really like your new signature. Good job on it ! Vegita Naluboutes ''AeriaGloris 19:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  22:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Apology
Hi! Thank you very much for the apology! I accept your apology. When I was younger I made mistakes too. We all do that when we start out. Anyway, happy new year!

WhisperToMe (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

RE:January 2011
Please do not spam my page again and next time please use your brain so then maybe you can tell a comment from vandalism Totalaero (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll ignore that last part and address the first. That was not spam, it was a notification. One should never modify a closed discussion whether it be a move request, merger discussion, xfd, or otherwise. However, you clearly and evidently did so just hours shy of a full fortnight after its closure as seen here. Next time, please try some civility without the personal attacks. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  06:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Just look at this http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=481450071331&set=a.133998411331.118603.83052256331 toms chips is about to be shipped world wide and what does his trusted Wikipedia page says for his name.... the copyrighted name he used in the other company because people can't get over the fact on how things change. Totalaero (talk) 15:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It still doesn't change the fact that you modified a closed discussion. If you have a problem with the name, open a new request on the appropriate page. Consensus can change. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  18:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hamster style
Hello Evilgohan2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hamster style, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 doesn't apply to deejaying methods. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 06:25, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I DJ myself; it just looked to me to be something that would be better suited to the Wikitionary, especially due to it's lack of sources (which may be a situation where WP:IAR comes into play due to the inherent original research required). ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  06:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Mason Ryan
I'm confused as to why you reverted the edit, and why you thought it biased? Sepmix (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * One should never post on what someone's alignment is. It's impossible to ask every single person what their opinion on a specific performer is. Doing such is inherently based on a person's perspective - no matter how you draw the line - and is inevitably going to be a POV edit. In this case, as the saying loosely goes, one person's villain ("Let's Go Cena!") is another person's hero ("Cena Sucks!"). It might also be considered as Fancruft. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  22:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Why does that apply to the rest of the roster then? Sepmix (talk) 09:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what your asking. Are you asking if I apply that to other articles or just this one? If that is the case, I apply it to all I see. I'm not omniscient so I can only edit the ones I come across. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  13:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Mason Ryan
I am not edit warring. I am just improving the article with fresh information. The guy is reverting a real fact everytime I post it without a reason. If it is a "edit war" why not advert the other guy too? Am I "warring" with myself? And I am not using Lordsofpain as a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.30.150 (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The notification was generally directed. They should be well versed in what constitutes WP:3RR - especially NiciVampireHeart who it appears did not carry on with reverts and is not in violation of it. Now when reverting what appears to be vandalism, Dcheagle looks to have gotten overzealous in the matter and is potentially in violation of the 3RR rule, but likewise, you are too. I did issue him fair warning of such as well but he has not responded to such. As for Lordsofpain, that appeared to be the initial source used and was what I made a note for. With regards to the sources used, they are honestly dubious at best and subject to being challenged. I'd suggest finding a reliable source to cite as to avert any potential issues at all. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  06:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The problem with the "reliable sources" thing is that all websites in the list do not care about FCW anymore. So it is difficult to find a source of FCW results that is accepted by anyone. Dcheagle knows it because we are discussing it here. But he in fact preffers do this kind of thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.30.150 (talk) 06:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikimania 2012 bid, DC chapter & next meetup!

 * 1) At WikiXDC in January, User:Harej proposed that DC submit a bid to host Wikimania 2012. A bid and organizing committee is being formed and seeks additional volunteers to help. Please look at our bid page and sign up if you want to help out.  You can also signup for the bid team's email list.
 * 2) To support the Wikimania bid, more events like WikiXDC, and outreach activities like collaborations with the Smithsonian (ongoing) and National Archives, there also has been discussion of forming Wikimedia DC, as an official Wikimedia chapter.  You can express interest and contribute to chapter discussions on the Wikimedia DC Meta-Wiki pages.
 * 3) To discuss all this and meet up with special guest, Dutch Wikipedian User:Kim Bruning, there will be a meetup, Meetup/DC 16 this Tuesday at 7pm, at Capitol City Brewery, Metro Center. There will be a pre-meetup Wikimania team meeting at 6pm at the same location.

Apologies for the short notice for this meetup, but let's discuss when, where & what for DC Meetup #17. Also, if you haven't yet, please join wikimedia-dc mailing list to stay informed. Cheers, User:Aude (talk)

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Meetup/DC/Invite/List. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

Civility
Is "put up or shut up" civil? And what about reporting someone by mistake and do not say sorry? And accusing someone without certainty? What about not discuss just threaten? WWEJobber (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Question
I see you like editing the Nexus wikipage alot. Are you a big fan of the group?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 00:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not in particular, at least in it's current incarnation. Honestly, I preferred it immensely during it's initial run for the first month or so. I just have a penchant for the removal of misinformation and unsourced information and because Nexus is such a high visibility target for such, it's where most of my attention goes when it comes to reverting / correcting. I might even make some significant or minor contributions here and there to it, but for the most part, I'm for cleaning it up, fixing a grammatical error or two, and moving on. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  00:18, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool. I just wondered because you were editing it alot. Are you apart of the Wikiproject Professional Wrestling?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 00:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Brock Lesnar article
I wanted to say thanks for the support on getting the Lesnar article indefinitely semi-protected. I am new to wikipedia and didn't know how to check out the protection log, but I suspected that it's a pretty popular article for vandalism. I believe thanks to your endorsement, we were able to get it protected indefinitely. And I want to thank you for that. Dachknanddarice ( T ‖ C ) 17:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Anime and manga/O-Parts Hunter work group
WikiProject Anime and manga/O-Parts Hunter work group, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/O-Parts Hunter work group and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Anime and manga/O-Parts Hunter work group during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  07:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Hello Evilgohan2. Thanks for the speedy deletion work you are doing; it's a very important activity! I did want to let you know, though, regarding When New York Was Irish, that current consensus holds that it is bad practice to tag articles for speedy deletion as lacking context (CSD A1) or content (CSD A3) moments after creation, as users may be actively working on the article content. Ten to fifteen minutes is considered a good time to wait before tagging such articles under either of these criteria. Please note that before an appropriate waiting period is over, the articles should not be marked as patrolled, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time. Nothing here is meant to apply to any other criterion; attack pages and copyright violations especially should be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.  elektrik SHOOS  04:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I hear you and generally would apply the same practices as well. Generally, I follow policy in these matters to the letter outside of exigent circumstances when an account seems to be merely being used for promotional purposes. This is not a decision I come to on a whim and indeed based it upon the swift and brief edits to two articles. It was the initial edit by the user which particularly prompted me to come to the conclusion that it was a promotional page. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  04:49, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

DC Meetup: May 7 @ Tenleytown Library
The next DC Wikimedia meetup is scheduled for Saturday, May 7, 3:30-5:30 pm at the Tenleytown Library (adjacent to the Tenleytown Metro Station, Red Line), followed by dinner & socializing at some nearby place.

This is the first official meeting of our proposed Wikimedia DC chapter, with discussion of bylaws and next steps. Other agenda items include, update everyone on our successful Wikimania bid and next steps in the planning process, discuss upcoming activities that we want to do over the summer and fall, and more.

Please RSVP here and see a list of additional tentatively planned meetups & activities for late May & June on the Meetup/DC page.

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Meetup/DC/Invite/List. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

CM Punk dispute
I tried to lend a hand with a neutral solution but obviously this other user isn't budging on his opinion. My solution would be to formally put it up for discussion on the third party opinion page that you linked. I'd do it myself but as I've already been involved, it seems to frown on me doing so. I agree that it certainly does seem to come across as a worked shoot but remain of the opinion that it's irrelevant to the article itself and unless something major happens as a result, shouldn't even be linked at all. NJZombie (talk) 02:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

GLAM-Wiki Baltimore meetup
 You are invited to the first Wikipedia Baltimore meetup on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the Walters Art Museum. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area!

There also is a Wikipedia & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist Happy Hour on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.

Note: You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

The WikiProject National Archives Newsletter
The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic·t 21:22, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Change on Kurt Angle
I didn't know that when the moments Kurt Angle turn heel and face I was being inaccurate. You're totally right. I never watched wrestling for over 20 years. I so don't know what and when are heel and face turns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.88.217.38 (talk) 02:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Air_Boom
You seem to have closed the discussion when at the bottom, GaryColemanFan, CRRaysHead90 and Deely asked for it to continue to reach a consensus. "Comment Although the nominator has dropped his objections, I would still like to see this AfD continue and reach a consensus, as this is an issue that has been discussed many times in recent years. Rather that leave the discussion half-way, I am hoping that we can reach an actual decision on creating pages for other tag team champions. It would be much more helpful to be able to point to this as a consensus (either for or against) rather than have the constant "Now?" "No, not yet." "Now?" "Not yet." discussions for years to come. In addition, I am concerned about the "FOR NOW" comment, as I do not believe that an article's subject can lose its notability, and I dont want to come back to this same discussion in the near future. - GaryColemanFan" Starship.paint (talk) 01:07, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies for that. I did not notice that and closed it upon the nominators withdrawal. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  01:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

You're invited! Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

CM Punk
I have nominated CM Punk at WP:TFAR. There are some issues regarding its references that some current editors will need to address if this article is to appear on the main page on his birthday. Please see Today's_featured_article/requests.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I am going to withdraw the nomination within a few days, if there is no indication that its active editors are uninterested in cleaning it up for a main page run.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)