User talk:Evilpete123

Shuteye
A tag has been placed on Shuteye, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Shuteye. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such material. --Fsotrain09 05:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nad Navillus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 03:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as The United State of Americana, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. RJASE1 Talk  03:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Jeff Black
Please stop removing the "unreferenced" tag from this article unless you add reliable, third-party sources that demonstrate that the subject is notable. Adding internal links to other Wikipedia articles does not count as adding sources. Please see WP:ATT and let me know if you have any questions. You seem to be creating a large number of article that are focused on a indie record label. If you are associated with that label (your user name indicates that you possibly share a first name with the founder) please also take a look at the conflict of interest policies at WP:COI. If you are not affliated with the record label, but are simply a fan you might want to consider stepping back and working with articles on a subject that you feel a little less strongly about. Sometimes when we really care about a subject, we can become somewhat blinded to notability requirements. This is why lots of editors (including myself) prefer to work on subjects that they don't feel personal affliated with. Please let me know if I can help in any way and welcome to Wikipedia! janejellyroll 03:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Promotional articles
Hello, I thank you for your contributions, but they all seem to promote this one business. Please stop adding material just to promote that one record company. If you continue, you will be blocked. —— Eagle 101  Need help? 04:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)