User talk:EvoMM05

Welcome!

 * }

July 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kim mccosker has been reverted. Your edit here to Kim mccosker was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com.au/4ingredientspage) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kim mccosker


The article Kim mccosker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. D u s t i *poke* 01:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Kim mccosker, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Kim mccosker was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://glutenfreefun.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/4-ingredients-gluten-free-winner-and.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Articles for creation/Kim&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! (chat) techatology  13:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Kim McCosker
Hey, nice work on that article about Kim McCosker. I'm surprised that the author of such a popular series of books hadn't yet been written about here at Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind that I've taken the opportunity to bring the article more in line with Wikipedia style guidelines. Let me know if I've lost any of the essential information. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello EvoMM05 and WikiDan61! There's an article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim McCosker which is now redundant, since you have made another article in the main encyclopedia. However, the draft article has some info and sources that aren't in the main article.  You may want to copy over anything useful before the draft is deleted.  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 17:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, Anne. I had actually looked at all of those sources (they were all in the draft that I cleaned up), but several of the sources are only peripherally about McCosker, but rather concentrate on the design of her website.  (Interesting, but in the end, not really germane to the subject.)  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim McCosker concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kim McCosker, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)