User talk:EvolveBuster

Hello, EvolveBuster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Port Lincoln have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 01:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. McSly (talk) 03:24, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Year. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Transitional fossil, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I've looked over your edits too, and I see the adding of blatant falsehoods and religious POV-pushing to articles about evolution, and a blatant attack on Islam - that's far more than "I made a mistake when added a reference note". -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

You should well know that what a couple of lynch mobs say are not representative of the religion(s) as a whole. –MuZemike 00:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Abuse of Talk page - access revoked. Contact WP:BASC if you want to make further appeals -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)